Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.32 seconds)
Documents citing Anil Sagar vs Gaon Sabha Village & Ors. on 2 December, 1999

Kishan Chand vs Gaon Sabha, Bharthal And Ors. on 5 March, 2007

13. Under Rule 170 of the Delhi Land Reform Rules before finalising a demarcation the objector must be given an opportunity to lead evidence. That has been explained by this Court to be mandatory in the decision in Anil Sagar v. Gaon Sabha Village and Ors. . On the strength of this decision, the petitioner rightly contends that in the instant case the demarcation cannot stand scrutiny in law since the petitioner has been denied an opportunity of leading evidence.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Muralidhar - Full Document

Karam Veer Singh vs Delhi Development Authority on 19 January, 2017

The said report wherein no opportunity was given to one of  the effected party cannot  be  relied  upon. The  said  report thus  also  ignores  the  mandate New Case No. 7531/16 (old case no. 296/09/92)  Page No. 10/21 provided   under   Rule   170   of   Delhi   Land   Reform   Rules   as   well   as principles of Natural Justice.  The chairman of the Board was not acting as representative of DDA but as Court Commissioner hence the other affected party's view should have been considered before finalization of report.     To   support   this   view   I   am   guided   by  Anil   Sagar   Vs.   Gaon Sabha and ors., 84 2000 DLT 212.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Baldei vs Delhi Development Authority on 19 January, 2017

The said report wherein no opportunity was given to one of  the effected party New Case No. 7535/16 (old case no. 175/04)  Page No. 10/21 cannot  be  relied  upon. The  said  report thus  also  ignores  the  mandate provided   under   Rule   170   of   Delhi   Land   Reform   Rules   as   well   as principles of Natural Justice.  The chairman of the Board was not acting as representative of DDA but as Court Commissioner hence the other affected party's view should have been considered before finalization of report.     To   support   this   view   I   am   guided   by  Anil   Sagar   Vs.   Gaon Sabha and ors., 84 2000 DLT 212.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Delhi Development Authority vs Kanwar Singh (Deceased) Thr Lrs & Ors on 7 April, 2021

Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the learned Trial Court has erred in not appreciating that at the time of conducting the demarcation, the Tehsildar did not have the appropriate record such as field book, masavi and shajra plan and the demarcation was done without taking the three pucca points. The Tehsildar wrongly rendered the report by observing that the Respondents are in possession of the suit property since the time of their forefather without any evidence to that effect and even the demarcation report was not exhibited as per law. The Tehsildar never stepped into the witness box and therefore, was not even put to cross-examination. It is also argued that under Rule 170 of the Delhi Land Reforms Rules before finalizing the demarcation, the objector must be given an opportunity to lead evidence as held by this Court in Anil Sagar vs. Gaon Sabha and Ors., (2000) 84 DLT 212.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 6 - J Singh - Full Document

Ram Sagar vs Sub Divisional Magistrate And 18 Others on 9 December, 2019

"issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent no.1 to decide the stay application dated 11.09.2019 in Case No.T201914360302785 (Ram Sagar vs. Gaon Sabha and others) under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Act, 2006, pending before the respondent No.1 within stipulated period at an early date as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court"
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A K Mishra - Full Document
1