Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.84 seconds)
Documents citing E C I Engineering And Construction Co. ... vs North East Frontier Railwayand Ors on 10 November, 2021

Mittal Processors (P) Ltd vs Central Cottage Industries ... on 26 November, 2024

In the case of Patel Engineering Ltd Vs. North East- ern Electric Power Corp Ltd, 2020 (7) SCC 167 , it was observed that in paragraphs (39) & (40) of Ssangyong Engineering (supra), the Court reiterated paragraphs (42.2) & (42.3) of Associate Builders (supra), wherein, it was held that construction of the terms of a contract is primarily for Ld. Arbitrator to decide, unless the Ld. Arbitrator construes a contract in a manner, which no fair minded or reasonable person would take i.e. if a view taken by the Ld. Arbitrator is not even a possible view to take. It was held that the ground of patent illegality is a ground available under the Digitally signed by VINEETA GOYAL VINEETA Date:
Delhi District Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ms Atc Foods Private Limited vs Union Of India on 20 February, 2025

In the case of Patel Engineering Ltd Vs. North East- ern Electric Power Corp Ltd, 2020 (7) SCC 167 , it was observed that in paragraphs (39) & (40) of Ssangyong Engineering (supra), the Court reiterated paragraphs (42.2) & (42.3) of Associate Builders (supra), wherein, it was held that construction of the terms of a contract is primarily for Ld. Arbitrator to decide, unless the Ld. Arbitrator construes a contract in a manner, which no fair minded or reasonable person would take i.e. if a view taken by the Ld. Arbitrator is not even a possible view to take. It was held that the ground of patent illegality is a ground available under the statute for setting aside a domestic award, if the decision of the Ld. Arbitrator is found to be perverse or so irrational that no reasonable person would have arrived at the same; or the construction of the contract is such that no fair or reasonable OMP (Comm) No.130/21 M/s ATC Foods P.Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. Page 15 of 27 person would take or that the view of the arbitrator is not even a possible view.
Delhi District Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Atc Foods Private Limited vs Union Of India on 20 February, 2025

In the case of Patel Engineering Ltd Vs. North East- ern Electric Power Corp Ltd, 2020 (7) SCC 167 , it was observed that in paragraphs (39) & (40) of Ssangyong Engineering (supra), the Court reiterated paragraphs (42.2) & (42.3) of Associate Builders (supra), wherein, it was held that construction of the terms of a contract is primarily for Ld. Arbitrator to decide, unless the Ld. Arbitrator construes a contract in a manner, which no fair OMP (Comm) No.131/21 M/s ATC Foods P.Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. Page 15 of 27 minded or reasonable person would take i.e. if a view taken by the Ld. Arbitrator is not even a possible view to take. It was held that the ground of patent illegality is a ground available under the statute for setting aside a domestic award, if the decision of the Ld. Arbitrator is found to be perverse or so irrational that no reasonable person would have arrived at the same; or the construction of the contract is such that no fair or reasonable person would take or that the view of the arbitrator is not even a possible view.
Delhi District Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Atc Foods Private Limited vs Union Of India on 20 February, 2025

In the case of Patel Engineering Ltd Vs. North East- ern Electric Power Corp Ltd, 2020 (7) SCC 167 , it was observed that in paragraphs (39) & (40) of Ssangyong Engineering (supra), the Court reiterated paragraphs (42.2) & (42.3) of Associate Builders (supra), wherein, it was held that construction of the terms of a contract is primarily for Ld. Arbitrator to decide, unless the Ld. Arbitrator construes a contract in a manner, which no fair minded or reasonable person would take i.e. if a view taken by the Ld. Arbitrator is not even a possible view to take. It was held that the ground of patent illegality is a ground available under the statute for setting aside a domestic award, if the decision of the Ld. Arbitrator is found to be perverse or so irrational that no reasonable person would have arrived at the same; or the construction of the contract is such that no fair or reasonable CS (Comm)-129/2021 ATC Foods Private Limited v/s Union of India & Ors Page 14 of 26 person would take or that the view of the arbitrator is not even a possible view.
Delhi District Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

N.S Associates Pvt Ltd vs Gurmon Hotels Pvt Ltd on 3 March, 2025

In the case of Patel Engineering Ltd Vs. North East- ern Electric Power Corp Ltd, 2020 (7) SCC 167 , it was observed that in paragraphs (39) & (40) of Ssangyong Engineering (supra), the Court reiterated paragraphs (42.2) & (42.3) of Associate Builders (supra), wherein, it was held that construction of the terms of a contract is primarily for Ld. Arbitrator to decide, unless the Ld. Arbitrator construes a contract in a manner, which no fair minded or reasonable person would take i.e. if a view taken by the Ld. Arbitrator is not even a possible view to take. It was held that the ground of patent illegality is a ground available under the statute for setting aside a domestic award, if the decision of the Ld. Arbitrator is found to be perverse or so irrational that no rea- sonable person would have arrived at the same; or the construction of the contract is such that no fair or reasonable person would take or that the view of the arbitrator is not even a possible view.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1