Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.94 seconds)
Documents citing Ganpat Lal Lakhotia vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 18 September, 1996

Moti And Ors vs State Of Raj And Ors on 8 May, 2019

In the case of Ganpat Lal and others (supra), a Division Bench of this Court, while dealing with the scope and ambit of Sections 88 and 188 of the Act of 1955, in somewhat identical factual matrix in no uncertain terms, observed that a suit for declaration of 'Khatedari' rights and permanent injunction on the basis of 'Parcha Khatoni' decreed after acquisition proceedings concluded and mutation opened; such suit proceedings could not be maintained after acquisition of the land. At this juncture, it will (Downloaded on 28/06/2019 at 11:56:09 PM) (16 of 20) [CW-11141/2014] be profitable to take note of the text of paragraphs 16 to 18, which reads thus:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - V S Siradhana - Full Document

Vinod Sharma vs Moti And Ors on 8 May, 2019

In the case of Ganpat Lal and others (supra), a Division Bench of this Court, while dealing with the scope and ambit of Sections 88 and 188 of the Act of 1955, in somewhat identical factual matrix in no uncertain terms, observed that a suit for declaration of 'Khatedari' rights and permanent injunction on the basis of 'Parcha Khatoni' decreed after acquisition proceedings concluded and mutation opened; such suit proceedings could not be maintained after acquisition of the land. At this juncture, it will (D.B. SAW/764/2019 and 1 more have been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders) (Downloaded on 28/06/2019 at 11:55:59 PM) (16 of 20) [CW-11141/2014] be profitable to take note of the text of paragraphs 16 to 18, which reads thus:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - V S Siradhana - Full Document

Nitin Saini vs State on 1 November, 2007

In response to the particular query made to the learned Counsel for the respondent in the application Mr. Hora submits that Court is fully empowered to convert the arrest warrant into bailable warrant as held by this Court in the case of Ganpat Lal v. State of Rajasthan reported in 2000(1) RCD (Raj.) Page 561. Mr. Hora further placed reliance on the judgments reported in 2000(2), RCD (Raj.) Page 883, (2002) 2 Crl. L.J. Page 924 and (2002) 3 RCC Page 1511.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - K S Rathore - Full Document

Commissioner Of Sales Tax, Madhya ... vs M/S Popular Trading Company, Ujjain on 5 April, 2000

This Court in Ganpat Lal Lakhotia vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., 1997 (10) SCC 455, quoted with approval what was stated in Sri Krishna Coconut Co. vs. CTO, 1965 (16) STC 511 (AP), wherein it was stated as follows :- "In a tender coconut, the kernel is hardly formed or is only in the initial stages of formation. In a dried coconut the kernel has formed and fully developed and further the water inside the coconut has dried up leading to the drying of the kernel also. But a fully grown coconut with a well-developed kernel which contains water cannot be called either a tender or a dried coconut. This is the well-known variety of coconuts used for culinary purposes and on auspicious occasions and as part of the offerings in temple. I do not think it is correct or reasonable to describe this class of coconuts as either dried or tender."
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 45 - Full Document

Premaram Goyal vs State Of Raj. & Ors on 27 May, 2009

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1668/2009 DINESH KATANIA VS. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1669/2009 GEETA LOMROD VS. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1670/2009 FATEH SINGH VS. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1671/2009 PRADEEP KUMAR SHARMA VS. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1672/2009 MOHANI LOMROD VS. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1673/2009 LEELA DEVI VS. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1674/2009 SHAITAN RAM KADWASARA VS. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1675/2009 GANPAT LAL VS. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1676/2009 PINKI LOMROD VS. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1677/2009 MAHENDRA SINGH VS. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1678/2009 SMT. SANTOSH DEVI VS. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1679/2009 MADAN SINGH BENDA VS. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4253/2009 HAJI MOHAMMED VS. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4254/2009 SUHABUDDIN KHAN GAURI VS. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4255/2009 LOKESH KUMAR OJHA VS. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS SBCWP No.1244/2009 Smt. Randeep Kaur Vs. State of Raj. & Ors alongwith other connected GNM matters.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 65 - Cited by 159 - P C Tatia - Full Document
1   2 3 Next