Anand @ Kallu Bhatt vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 30 September, 2024
4. The counsel for the applicant contends that in the present case,
the moot question which requires consideration is as regards implication
under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code in
absence of any inducement or incitement. It is further contended that if
the suicide note as well as statement of the wife of the deceased are
taken into consideration on their face value, no case under Section 306
of the Indian Penal Code is made out against the applicant. The deceased
was having dispute pertaining to service condition at his work place,
therefore, he committed suicide, yet the applicant is being sought to be
made a scapegoat, therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside
and the applicant deserves to be discharged from the aforesaid charge.
The counsel has placed reliance on the decision of the Apex Court
in Prabhu Vs. The State rep by the Inspector of Police [SLP (Crl) Diary
No. 39981/2022 decided on 30.1.2024]; Khairu Vs. State of M.P. and
others - 2024 SCC Online MP 5271 and order dated 7.5.2024 passed by
this Court in Criminal Revision No. 329 of 2022 (Anju Raidas & others
Vs. State of M.P. and another).