Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.26 seconds)
Documents citing Digilife Distribution And Marketing ... vs M/S Stalco Consultancy & Systems Pvt. ... on 7 September, 2018

Yum! Restaurants India Private Limited vs A.N. Traders Private Limited & Ors. on 28 February, 2024

38. The plaintiff has relied upon Oil & Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. vs. State Bank of India, 2001 SCC OnLine Bom 119; Daryanani (Indo Saigon) Construction (P) Ltd. vs. Mantri Realty Ltd., 2017, SCC OnLine Bom 7963; Khera Handloom Supply vs. O.B. Exports, 1990 SCC OnLine Del 42 and Diglife Distribution & Marketing Services Ltd. vs. Stalco Consultancy & Systems (P) Ltd., 2018 SCC OnLine Del 11278, wherein, it is submitted that where an amount is admitted by the defendants then merely because a claim for interest is made in the Legal Notice making a demand from the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CS(COMM) 376/2019 Page 12 of 13 By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:01.03.2024 16:14:58 defendants, before the filing of the suit and subsequently, is a statutory right conferred by Section 34 and the claim of interest cannot be considered to be beyond the scope of Order 37 CPC, provided there are no other ground, which have been agitated in the Leave to Defend application.
Delhi High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - N B Krishna - Full Document

Itc Limited vs Ms. Samita Bhatia Proprietor S.S. ... on 23 April, 2024

23. The law on payment of interest has been settled in Oil and Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. vs. State Bank of India, 2001 SCC OnLine Bom 119; Daryanani (Indo Saigon) Construction (P) Ltd. vs. Mantri Realty Ltd., 2017 SCC OnLine Bom 7963; Khera Handloom Supply vs. O.B. Exports, 1990 SCC OnLine Del 42 and Diglife Distribution and Marketing Services Ltd. vs. Stalco Consultancy and Systems (P) Ltd., 2018 SCC OnLine Del 11278, wherein it was held that where an amount/liability is admitted by the defendants, then merely a claim for interest made in the Legal Notice making a demand from the defendants, which was not mutually agreed by the parties, would not make the Suit/claim beyond the scope of Order XXXVII CPC, 1908.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - N B Krishna - Full Document

Avadh Bihari Kaushik vs Vikram Singh Yadav on 28 October, 2025

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/11/2025 at 21:10:14 "23. The law on payment of interest has been settled in Oil and Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. v. State Bank of India, 2001 SCC OnLine Bom 119; Daryanani (Indo Saigon) Construction (P) Ltd. v. Mantri Realty Ltd., 2017 SCC OnLine Bom 7963; Khera Handloom Supply v. O.B. Exports, 1990 SCC OnLine Del 42 and Diglife Distribution and Marketing Services Ltd. v. Stalco Consultancy and Systems (P) Ltd., 2018 SCC OnLine Del 11278, wherein it was held that where an amount/liability is admitted by the defendants, then merely a claim for interest made in the Legal Notice making a demand from the defendants, which was not mutually agreed by the parties, would not make the Suit/claim beyond the scope of Order XXXVII CPC, 1908.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A J Bhambani - Full Document
1