Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.36 seconds)
Documents citing Ram Dhani Singh vs The State Of Bihar And Ors. on 4 April, 2007

Haricharan Chamar And Ors. vs Kapilmuni Ojha And Ors. on 24 January, 2008

11. Learned Counsel for the appellants has really based his claim on the observations made in paragraph -11 of the judgment set out hereinabove. Section 27 provides a detailed procedure for settlement of surplus lands. We are, therefore, of the view that the observation made in paragraph -11 of the judgment was rather misplaced. We are in this connection reminded of the judgment reported in 2007 (3) BBCJ 363 which is equal to 2007 (2) BLJR 1508; ( Ram Dhani Singh v. The State of Bihar and Ors.), wherein various judgments of the Supreme Court, and one of the Court of Appeal in England, have been referred, and it has been observed that the courts should not be moved by sentiments. Paras 18 & 19 of the judgment is reproduced hereinafter:
Patna High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

The Union Of India & Anr vs Shailendra Kumar & Anr on 4 August, 2009

25. Sentiment is dangerous guide in judicial proceedings, and should not be allowed to deflect the course of justice. We are in this connection reminded of the judgment dated 4.4.2007 of a Single Judge of this Court in Ram Dhani Singh Vs. The State of Bihar and others), delivered by one of us (S K Katriar, J.), since reported in 2007(4) P.L.J.R.332, wherein this proposition of law was elaborately discussed. We are mindful of the position that the same was the judgment of a learned Single Judge. However, the observations therein were entirely based on the judgments of the Supreme Court and one judgment of the Court of Appeal in England. The relevant portion of the judgment is reproduced hereinbelow for the facility of quick reference:
Patna High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - S K Katriar - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs The Central Adminis.Tribunal & on 17 March, 2010

5. We are also reminded of the long line of judgments to the effect that needless compassion should not be injected in judicial proceedings, which has the tendency to tilt the scales of justice. One of us ( S.K.Katriar, J.) had the occasion to recapitulate the line of cases in the judgment of Ram Dhani Singh vs. State of Bihar & Ors. reported in 2007(4) PLJR 332, paragraph no.15 to 19 of which was reproduced herein below:
Patna High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - S K Katriar - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs The Central Administrative Tri on 2 April, 2010

6. Learned counsel for respondent no.2 commenced his submission by stating that respondent no.2 is a widow. Respondent no.2 is evidently a widow, and a liberal view if possible should inform our approach, but equitable considerations have their limitations, cannot be permitted to override the dominant considerations of law. One of us (S.K.Katriar, J.), considering senior had the occasion to collate the judgments on this issue in the decision of Ram Dhani Singh versus State of Bihar & Ors. 2007(4) PLJR 332. Paragraph nos. 16 to 19 is reproduced herein below:
Patna High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S K Katriar - Full Document
1