Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.30 seconds)

State Of Rajasthan & Ors. vs . Smt. Dr.Monika Sharma on 23 April, 2010

Briefly put, the relevant facts of the case are that after facing the process of selection under the advertisement dated 06.11.2006 (Annex.1), the respondent (writ petitioner) came to be employed as Senior Resident (PG) in the specialty of gynecology by the order dated 23.12.2006 (Annex.2). While being posted with the Principal and Controller, RNT Medical College, Udaipur, the writ petitioner approached this Court in writ jurisdiction on the grievance that the respondents were denying her maternity leave on the ground that she was employed on consolidated salary. The learned Single Judge found that the issue whether a person working on consolidated salary/contract basis/fixed term was entitled for maternity leave or not, had been adjudicated by this Court in favour of the employee in the case of Durgesh Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: 2008 (2) RLW 1304 (Raj.); and issued the writ prayed for.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 3 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

Deepika Salvi vs State & Ors on 3 May, 2012

The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in the light of Rule 103 of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 (for short 'the Rules of 1951' hereinafter), the petitioner is entitled for maternity leave and salary thereon for the period concerned. Reliance is placed by learned counsel for the petitioner upon the judgment of this Court Durgesh Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (reported in 2008(2) RLW 1304 (Raj.)) holding as under :-
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - G Mathur - Full Document
1