Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.26 seconds)
Documents citing Vishal Chandok And Another vs State Of Haryana And Another on 8 February, 2011

Cbi vs . Raj Kumar on 25 April, 2013

29. It is submitted by the defence counsel that as per the own case of the prosecution there are two witnesses of the spot conversation, PW-5 complainant and PW-6 Shadow witness. It is submitted that PW-5 has not supported the prosecution case. On this point he has been relying upon Vishal Chand V. State 2011 Part III RCR (Criminal) 304 Delhi. In this case complainant had turned hostile and stated that accused did not make any demand and rather the complainant offered Rs.4000/- and posed currency notes into the pocket of the pant of the accused.
Delhi District Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepesh Chandhok vs Tanisha on 17 October, 2018

6. Mr. Rajiv Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the amount of maintenance is still highly excessive while contending that the total salary of the petitioner is `85,000/- per month and after deduction of taxes etc., the carry-home salary of the petitioner is `78,000/- per month. It is also argued that the petitioner and his family members have been subjected to cruelty at the hands of the respondent with a result that the petitioner was forced to move out of the house and to start living with his parents. It is also argued that it is on account of the conduct of the complainant-respondent, the petitioner was forced to resign from his job on account of the fact that complainant created a scene in the office premises, as well as got warrants of arrest issued on the office of the company. It is contended that he remained jobless from 28.02.2015 and it is only subsequent thereto that he got a job with M/s Virtusa Consulting from 31.07.2017 and is working there till date. It is also urged that the respondent broke open all the locks of the flat No. 805, Ashoka Apartment, Sector 56, Gurgaon and forcibly occupied the afore-mentioned flat. It is also submitted that on this account, the mother of the petitioner also filed a petition bearing No. CRM-M-13988-2012 titled as Asha Chandok Vs. State of Haryana for taking action against the respondent as she had forcibly broken the lock of the house of petitioner's parents and occupied the same.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - J Thakur - Full Document
1