Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.49 seconds)

Sri. Balachandra R vs Shashidhar Gowda H D on 14 October, 2024

7. The Trial Court relied upon the judgment of a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Danappagouda Fakkiragouda Patil v. Kamalawwa and Another [2006 (4) KCCR 2439] and the order passed in W.P.No.7105/2008 and held that when the purchaser was already in possession of the property even prior to the agreement of sale and hence, there -7- NC: 2024:KHC:41536 WP No. 42994 of 2017 was no question of payment of duty and penalty. In so far registration of the agreement of sale under Section 17(1A) of the Registration Act is concerned, it held that Section 17(1A) was introduced with effect from 24.09.2001 and as the agreement in question was executed on 16.02.2005, the agreement had to be compulsorily registered and since it was not registered, it was inadmissible in evidence.
Karnataka High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1