Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.76 seconds)
Documents citing Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited vs Inderjeet on 19 February, 2010

M/S Control Print Limited vs Ajitpal Singh Rana on 8 January, 2019

the aforesaid decision of the Supreme Court was a short order, which did not discuss other Supreme Court decisions. The Division Bench in this case also negated the contention that merely by filing delayed application, the workman should be given wages from the date of affidavit and not from the date of the Award. Following discussion contained in the said judgment was relied upon:
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 2 - A M Goel - Full Document

Sh Surender Kumar vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation on 17 October, 2022

(emphasis supplied) After culling out the principles laid down by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Food Craft Instt (supra), the Division Bench of this Court noticed another judgment passed by another Division Bench of this Court vide Order dated 29.07.2008 in Delhi Transport Corporation v. Inderjeet Singh, wherein the Division Bench has held as under:
Delhi High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 3 - S Prasad - Full Document

United Poly Engineering Pvt Ltd vs Presiding Officer Labour Court & Anr. on 24 January, 2023

(emphasis supplied) After culling out the principles laid down by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Food Craft Instt (supra), the Division Bench of this Court noticed another judgment passed by another Division Bench of this Court vide Order dated 29.07.2008 in Delhi Transport Corporation v. Inderjeet Singh, wherein the Division Bench has held as under:
Delhi High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Santosh Kumari & Anr. on 24 August, 2012

24. However, as pointed out above by Mr. Anuj Aggarwal that this judgment was considered by a Division Bench in Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Inderjeet Singh (decided on 29.7.2008) holding that the aforesaid decision of the Supreme Court was a short order, which did not discuss other Supreme Court decisions. The Division Bench in this case also negated the contention that merely by filing delayed application, the workman should be given wages from the date of affidavit and not from the date of the Award. Following discussion contained in the said judgment was relied upon:
Delhi High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 15 - A K Sikri - Full Document

M.T.N.L. vs Ram Rattan on 11 July, 2012

7. Learned Counsel for the applicant-respondent, on the other hand, has submitted that mere delay in filing this application is no ground for denying the relief of wages to him. Reliance has been placed on an unreported judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in the case of "Delhi Transport Corporation v. Inderjeet Singh" given on 29.07.2008 in LPA No. 392 of 2008. Regarding the effect of delay in filing the application under Section 17 B of the Act this Court had observed:
Delhi High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - P K Bhasin - Full Document
1