Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.42 seconds)
Documents citing Dinesh Supari Traders And Ors. vs Agricultural Produce Marketing ... on 23 September, 2005

R.B.I vs And Others Ms. S.N. Finance Limited on 22 January, 2024

41. Complainant relied on the authority of the Hon'ble high court of Karnataka in ILR 2005 KAR 5804 between M/s Dinesh Suprai Traders and others v. Agricultural produce marketing(Regulations) committee, Kadur. According to Black's law dictionary " continuing offenses means type of rime which is committed over a span of time. As to period of statute of limitation, the last act of the offence control for commencement of the period. A continuing offense such that only the last act thereof within the period of the stature of limitations need be alleged in the indictment or information, is one which may consist of separate acts or a course of conduct but which arises from that singleness of thought, purpose or action which may be deemed a single impulse.
Bangalore District Court Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mahalingam vs State on 15 November, 2016

15. It is a common knowledge that the cognizance of the offence cannot be taken by a Court of Law, after the period of 'Limitation', commencing from the date of knowledge. In fact, Section 470 Cr.P.C., speaks of 'Exclusion of time in certain cases'. An offence under Section 406 IPC is a continuous one. Undoubtedly, whether the case is beyond the period of limitation or otherwise is a mixed question of Fact and Law. A continuing offence, viz., last act thereof, within the period of limitation need be alleged in the indictment or information is one, which may consist of separate acts or a Code of Conduct, which arises from the singleness of thought, purpose or action, which may be deemed a single offence. In respect of a continuous crime, it means one consisting of a continuous series of acts, which endures after the period of consummation of such an offence of carrying on sealed weapons. A continuing offence is one, which is susceptible to of continuance and is distinguishable from one, which is committed once and for all, in case the offence continues till the date of filing of the Complaint, as per the decision in the case of (Dinesh Supari Traders Vs. A.P.M. (Regulations) Committee) reported in [(2006) C.R.L.J.) Page 255 (Special Page 259)].
Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - M Venugopal - Full Document
1