Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.56 seconds)

Balasaheb Patil vs Smt. Soni @ Sonia Patil on 12 July, 2024

In Vanita v. Deputy Commissioner & Ors. (supra), the son had transferred property to his father to avoid proceedings initiated by his wife under the D.V. Act, 2005. The Court held that the Senior Citizens Act, 2007 and D.V. Act, 2005 must be interpreted harmoniously, ensuring that the woman's 20 AIR Online 2020 SC 897 45 right to reside in the shared household is not undermined.
Karnataka High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Sony @Sonia Patil vs The Assistant Commissioner on 12 July, 2024

In Vanita v. Deputy Commissioner & Ors. (supra), the son had transferred property to his father to avoid proceedings initiated by his wife under the D.V. Act, 2005. The Court held that the Senior Citizens Act, 2007 and D.V. Act, 2005 must be interpreted harmoniously, ensuring that the woman's 20 AIR Online 2020 SC 897 45 right to reside in the shared household is not undermined.
Karnataka High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri Anil Kumar vs The Assistant Commissioner on 12 July, 2024

In Vanita v. Deputy Commissioner & Ors. (supra), the son had transferred property to his father to avoid proceedings initiated by his wife under the D.V. Act, 2005. The Court held that the Senior Citizens Act, 2007 and D.V. Act, 2005 must be interpreted harmoniously, ensuring that the woman's 20 AIR Online 2020 SC 897 45 right to reside in the shared household is not undermined.
Karnataka High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1