Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.28 seconds)

State vs Accused on 23 March, 2012

35. My decision in this regard finds support by principles of law laid down in case of Papatla John Veeranna v. State of A. P. & Anr., 2003 Cri. L.J. 2204, wherein the Andhra Pradesh High Court observed that the incident had taken place on 08.02.1998, whereas the complaint was submitted on 06.03.1998. The delay of one month was hardly explained. The time between the alleged date of occurrence and submission of complaint was so vast that it was possible to mediate or invent anything. When delay of two days was held to be fatal by the Supreme Court, it was just impossible to prosecute a person on the basis of a complaint submitted almost one month after the alleged date of commission of offence.
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1