M.Sreedhar vs The A.P. Co-Operative Tribunal, ... on 24 June, 2013
In Mungamuru Lakshmidevamma Vs. Land Acquisition
Officer and Revenue Divisional Officer, Kavali and Others28, a Division Bench of
this Court this Court held:
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (1.08 seconds)Documents citing
Mungamuru Lakshmidevamma vs Land Acquisition Officer And Revenue ... on 6 November, 1984
Naspuri Dharmaiah And Anr. vs Kota Veeraiah @ Dr. V.K. Kota on 22 November, 1993
6. The learned Counsel for the appellant cited the judgment of this Court in M. Lakshmidevamma v. The Land Acquisition Officer, for the proposition that the purchaser under an invalid or void sale could remain in adverse possession and acquire a valid title on the expiry of 12 years from the date of sale by virtue of Section 27 of the Limitation Act. There is no quarrel with the proposition enunciated in the said decision. But as I already pointed out, the acquisition of title by adverse possession is not established in the instant case merely on the strength of the so-called admission made by the defendant in the written statement.
Kotta Laxminarsaiah And 7 Ors. vs Tadasina Ramanarsamma on 22 July, 2005
To the same effect is the judgment of this Court in Mungamuru Laxmi Devamma v. Land Acquisition Officer, Kavali and Ors., . Till recently there used to be un! certainty as to whether the plea of adverse possession if proved can give raise to an independent title or its utility is confined to a valid defence alone. Recently, the Supreme Court held that a person in possession of property, adverse to the interests of titleholder, can institute the suit for declaration of title. The same was followed by this Court in several cases. Therefore, it needs to be seen as to whether the respondent proved her possession over the suit land from the date of Ex.A-1 till the date of filing the suit.
1