Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.19 seconds)

Chatarpal vs . Jyoti & Anr on 6 April, 2018

This   court   is   of   the considered   opinion   that   there   is   no   evidence   on   record   against   the accused persons. In the matter titled as Nabil Ahmed vs. State and Anr being Criminal Revision Petition no. 329 of 2017 decided on 30.05.2017 it has been held by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi that the evidence is to be recorded in the presence of the accused and there is no occasion for the pre summoning evidence being allowed to be adopted in as much as that would be a departure from the normal procedure and in the teeth of the requirement of evidence to be gathered in the presence of the accused. Even if for the sake of arguments, the cross examination of CW1 and CW3 is   to   be   considered   then   also   this   court   is   unable   to   find   anything incriminating   against   the   accused   persons.
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sonu Lakhwani vs Rinku Magan on 10 September, 2018

I am fortified in my reasoning in the judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi titled as Nabil Ahmed Vs.   State   and   another,   Crl.Rev.P   No.   329/17 decided   on  30.05.2017  wherein   in   para   11,   the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi has held as follows:­­ "11. It is trite that in criminal prosecution after   the   issuance   of   process   under Section 204 Cr.P.C., the evidence is to be recorded in the presence of accused (S.273   Cr.P.C.).
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1