Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 180 (2.04 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Punjab & Anr vs Shri Sukh Raj Bahadur on 22 February, 1968

State vs Raj Bahadur on 24 December, 2025

7. PW-03 deposed that on 05.08.2014, this witness was on emergency duty and on receiving DD No. 40A, he alongwith IO HC Subhash Chand reached the spot and FIR No. 473/2014 State vs Raj Bahadur Page 3 subsequently went to the LBS Hospital where the IO received the MLC of PW-01 and recorded his statement. Rukka was prepared and handed over to this witness for registration of FIR who left for the same and got registered the FIR at 07.30 pm, returned back with copy of FIR and handed over the copy of FIR and original rukka to the IO. Public persons were asked to join the investigation but none of them agreed and PW-03 joined the investigation with the IO for the search of accused but he was not found. The statement of this witness was recorded by the IO.
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bishan Lal Gupta vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 12 January, 1978

Therefore, there could be no question of injustice. The Division Bench to which the case was referred for hearing considered the rules applicable to termination of services of a probationer and found that they hid been fully complied with. It also examined cases which laid down that the form of the order is not decisive but the Court can be go behind the ostensibly innocuous order and investigate the real nature of the proceedings. The cases mentioned in this connection were : The State of Punjab & Ors. v. Sukh Raj Bahadur (supra), and the State of Bihar & Ors. v. Shiva Bhukshuk Mishra.(1) It then relied on cases in which the position of a probationer had been considered. These were :
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 95 - M H Beg - Full Document

S.B.I & Ors vs Palak Modi & Anr.Etc on 3 December, 2012

This Court referred to the averments contained in the pleadings of the parties, the judgments in Parshotam Lal Dhingra v. Union of India (supra), Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab (supra) State of Punjab v. Shri Sukh Raj Bahadur (supra), Union of India v. R.S. Dhaba (supra), State of Bihar v. Shiva Bhikshuk Mishra (supra), R.S. Sial v. State of U.P. (1974) 3 SCR 754, State of U.P. v. Ram Chandra Trivedi (1976) 4 SCC 52 and I.N. Saksena v. State of M.P. (1967) 2 SCR 496 and held:
Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 5 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

Kailash Chandra Sethia vs Rajasthan State Electricity Board And ... on 9 April, 1973

17. The preceding and the attendant circumstances have, therefore, to be examined whether any ex ports report was merely the motive for passing the order of termination of service or whether it was the very foundation of that order. Before doing So it will, however, be advantageous to refer to the facts which led to the decisions in State of Punjab v. Sukh Raj Bahadur (supra), and Union of India v. R.S. Dhaba (supra), in the earlier of these two cases, the respondent was appointed to the Punjab Civil Service (Executive Branch) on probation for a period of 18 months, from a post in the office of Chief Commissioner, Delhi. Although that period expired in July, 1954, it was not extended by any order. The respondent received a charge-sheet with a letter dated January 14, 1957 asking him to reply to the charges within a fortnight, and to state whether he would produce any defence or like to be heard in person. He sent a reply stating that he wanted an opportunity of being heard in person. He was, however, reverted to his substantive post by an order dated May 23/26, 1958. The charges against him were "fairly serious", but even so their Lordships of the Supreme Court upheld the reversion because they found that the departmental enquiry did not proceed beyond the stage of the charge-sheet, followed by the respondent's explanation thereto. They refused to consider the motive for the order, and upheld the respondent's reversion even though it was ordered some four years after the expiry of the unextended period of probation.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 23 - Cited by 12 - P N Shinghal - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next