Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 149 (1.93 seconds)
Documents citing Ghaziabad Zila Sahkari Bank Ltd vs Addl. Labour Commissioner & Ors on 17 January, 2007

Acit - 2(1)(2), Mumbai vs Central Bank Of India, Mumbai on 11 May, 2018

6. Ld. DR vehemently supported the order of the Assessing Officer in reopening of assessment. She further submitted that there is no change 5 ITA NOs. 6020, 6021 & 6022/MUM/2016 C.O NOs. 301, 302 & 303/MUM/2017 M/s. Central Bank of India of opinion as the Assessing Officer did not consider the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Vijaya Bank Ltd. v. Addl.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

U.P. Cooperative Federation Ltd. Thru. ... vs Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal ... on 12 September, 2023

22. It was submitted that Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act does not bar jurisdiction of Industrial Disputes Act. Section 135 of the U.P Cooperative Societies Act specifically provide for exclusion of the provisions of U.P Industrial Disputes Act, but the said section has not been given assent to by the President and consequently is not enforceable in State of U.P. It was vehemently submitted that unless a provision is assented to by the President, it cannot be deemed to be part of the statute, and cannot be taken into account for determining the intention of the legislature. It is for the aforesaid reasons it was submitted that for deciding a dispute between the employee of cooperative society and the cooperative society judgement of Supreme Court in the case of Dharappa Sangappa Nandyal Vs. Bijapur Co-operative Milk Producers Societies Union Ltd would fully prevail over the judgment of Ghaziabad Zila (Supra ) and accordingly there is no infirmity in the order passed by the Tribunal.
Allahabad High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - A Mathur - Full Document

M/S Sahakari Sangh Ltd. vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court & ... on 29 January, 2013

Thus, on a comparative reading of the judgment of the learned Single Judge in the case of Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies (supra), and the judgment of the Supreme Court reported in Ghaziabad Zila Sahkari Bank (supra) and in Krishan Prasad Gupta (supra), neither the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 has any application nor the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act have any application and the only remedy available to the Respondent no..2 in the given facts of the case is in under the U.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 and the Rules framed there under.
Allahabad High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - B A Sthalekar - Full Document

M/S Gangol Sahkari Dugdh Utpadak Sangh ... vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court-Ii ... on 7 April, 2017

24. I do not think it necessary to deal with these aforecited judgments as I have already held that the matter stands completely covered by the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ghaziabad Zila Sahkari Bank Ltd. (Supra) and the Labour Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the dispute raised by the respondent No.2.
Allahabad High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - S Chandra - Full Document

Shri. Suresh Shivajirao Kale vs Suvarnayug Sahakari Bank Ltd. And Anr on 6 October, 2023

k 17/25 3_wp_12485.16_as.doc We may hasten to add that if the provision is couched in a language to include such disputes (and we find such provisions in the Cooperative Societies Acts of certain States) and it is found that the Cooperative Society Act provides for complete machinery of redressal of grievances of the employees, then even the jurisdiction of the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal under the Industrial Disputes Act shall be barred having regard to the provisions of such a special statute vis-à-vis general statute like the Industrial Disputes Act (see Ghaziabad Zila Sahkari Bank Ltd. v. Labour Commissioner, (2007) 11 SCC 756: (2008) 1 SCC (L&S) 90.
Bombay High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - S V Marne - Full Document

M/S Pradhan Prabandhak, Kishan Sahkari ... vs State Of U.P. And Others on 28 March, 2012

4. Learned Counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner is a Co-operative Society Sugar Mill and is governed by the provisions of U.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as "Act, 1965") therefore the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act are not applicable in view of Apex Court's decision in Ghaziabad Zila Sahkari Bank Vs. Addl. Labour Commissioner 2007 (11) SCC 756.
Allahabad High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 2 - S Agarwal - Full Document

Firozabad Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh ... vs Presiding Officer,Labour Court, Agra & ... on 31 July, 2012

"It is said that Section 135 has not been enforced so far but the question as to whether despite of non enforcement of Section 135 of 1965 Act, the Central Act, 1947 or U.P. Act, 1947 would apply to the employees of a cooperative society governed by the provisions of 1965 Act and the rules and regulations framed thereunder came to be considered in Ghaziabad Zila Sahkari Bank Ltd. Vs. Addl. Labour Commissioner and others, JT 2007(2) SC 566 and it was held that Section 135 has been added only by way of clarification and abundant caution and, therefore, where the provisions are contained in 1965 Act, the labour laws and in particular the U.P. Act, 1947 would not be applicable. It is also said that 1965 Act alone would apply in the matter of employment of cooperative societies to the exclusion of all other laws since it is a complete code in itself as regards employment in cooperative societies and its machinery etc. In para 78 of the judgement the Apex Court held:
Allahabad High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 4 - B A Sthalekar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next