Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 991 (0.48 seconds)

Deepak vs State Of Punjab And Others on 14 October, 2022

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner PRASHANT KAPOOR 2022.10.14 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRWP-9807-2022 2 submits that he will be satisfied in case respondent No. 2, who is the competent authority in terms of Section 16 and 17 of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act of 1976') is directed to take decision in terms of the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Murti v. State of Punjab and others (LPA No. 32 of 2013, decided on 11.01.2013). The relevant extract of the said judgment reads thus:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Babu vs State Of Punjab And Others on 22 November, 2022

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case respondent No.2, who is the competent authority in terms of Section 16 and 17 of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act of 1976') is JAWALA RAM 2022.11.22 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-11082-2022 -2- directed to take decision in terms of the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Murti v. State of Punjab and others (LPA No. 32 of 2013, decided on 11.01.2013). The relevant extract of the said judgment reads thus:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ravi Kumar vs State Of Punjab And Others on 29 November, 2022

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case respondent No.2, who is the competent authority in terms of Section 16 and 17 of the Bonded Labour System JAWALA RAM 2022.11.29 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement. CRWP-11219-2022 -2- (Abolition) Act, 1976 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act of 1976') is directed to take decision in terms of the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Murti v. State of Punjab and others (LPA No. 32 of 2013, decided on 11.01.2013). The relevant extract of the said judgment reads thus:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Seema vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 3 February, 2023

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case respondent No.2, who is the competent JAWALA RAM 2023.02.03 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement. CRWP-1086-2023 -2- authority in terms of Section 16 and 17 of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act of 1976') is directed to take decision in terms of the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Murti v. State of Punjab and others (LPA No. 32 of 2013, decided on 11.01.2013). The relevant extract of the said judgment reads thus:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Akash vs State Of Punjab And Others on 8 April, 2023

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case respondent No.2, who is the competent authority in terms of Section 16 and 17 of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act of 1976') is directed to take decision in terms of the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Murti v. State of Punjab and others (LPA No. 32 of 2013, decided on 11.01.2013). The relevant extract of the said judgment reads thus:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Balwinder Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 20 April, 2023

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case respondent No.2, who is the competent authority in terms of Section 16 and 23 of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act of 1976') is directed to take decision in terms of the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Murti v. State of Punjab and others (LPA No. 32 of 2013, decided on 11.01.2013). The relevant extract of the said judgment reads thus:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gurpreet Singh vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 28 February, 2023

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case respondent No.2, who is the competent authority in terms of Section 16 and 17 of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act of 1976') is directed to take decision in terms of the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Murti v. State of Punjab and others (LPA No. 32 of 2013, decided on 11.01.2013). The relevant extract of the said judgment reads thus:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manga vs State Of Haryana And Others on 16 March, 2023

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case respondent No.2, who is the competent KAVITA NAIN 2023.03.16 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment CRWP-2561-2023 -2- authority in terms of Section 16 and 17 of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act of 1976') is directed to take decision in terms of the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Murti v. State of Punjab and others (LPA No. 32 of 2013, decided on 11.01.2013). The relevant extract of the said judgment reads thus:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next