Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Kerala And Anr. vs Joseph Vilangadan on 18 January, 1990

Rajasthan State Mines And Minerals Ltd. vs Eastern Engineering Enterprises And ... on 17 December, 1991

In State of Kerala v. Joseph Vilangandan (supra) while dealing with the power of arbitrator Under Sections 16 and 13 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 it was observed that even after remand all original powers of the arbitrator so far as they are not affected by the order of remission, or the provisions of the Arbitration Act are revived. But the powers and duties of the arbitrator shall not exceed those which are essential to give effect to the remand order. It was further observed that the arbitrator cannot rectify mistake without notice to the parties and without observing rules of judicial procedure.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Mahabir Industries vs Union Of India on 11 September, 2008

20. Having regard to the discrepancies noted and highlighted by the plaintiff, between the original A/T and the two risk purchase orders, in the pleadings, the observations of the Arbitrator with regard to major deviations between the two were of some importance. In any event they constituted material in favour of the plaintiff, to object to the award. By unilaterally deleting those terms, and calling the deletions as typographical corrections which the Arbitrator was allegedly entitled to do, he committed a legal misconduct within the term contemplated by law. The judgment reported as State of Kerala vs. Joseph Vilangadan, AIR 1990 Ker 276, is an authority on the point. The Division Bench of Kerala High Court held that an Arbitrator had no power to correct any clerical mistake or error arising from an accidental slip in an award which had become final. In this case, the award had been filed in Court which had taken cognizance by issuing notice on 17.4.1996.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - S R Bhat - Full Document
1