Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.55 seconds)

Prashant Shashi Ruia vs State Bank Of India on 16 December, 2021

61 It is to be pointed out that the term 'Debt' defined under Section 2(g) of the Act means any liability which is alleged as due from any Page 43 of 86 Downloaded on : Wed Jan 12 11:00:20 IST 2022 C/SCA/11199/2019 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 16/12/2021 person by a Bank during the course of any business activity undertaking by the Bank, in cash or otherwise, whether secured or unsecured, subsisting on, and legally recoverable on, the date of the application, as per the decision in the case of Tapan Kumar Mukhoty v. Bank of Madura Limited, 2001 D.R.T.C. 91 at page 99 (Cal.) 62 It is to be made mention of Section 17 of the RDDBFI Act, 1993 that a Tribunal shall exercise, on and from the appointed day, the jurisdiction, powers and authority to entertain and decide applications from the banks and financial institutions for recovery of debts due to them.
Gujarat High Court Cites 97 - Cited by 0 - J B Pardiwala - Full Document

R.Subramanian vs The Hongkong And Shanghai on 15 February, 2018

33.It is to be pointed out that the term 'Debt' defined under Section 2(g) of the Act means any liability which is alleged as due from any person by a Bank during the course of any business activity undertaking by the Bank, in cash or otherwise, whether secured or unsecured, subsisting on, and legally recoverable on, the date of the application, as per decision Tapan Kumar Mukhoty V. Bank of Madura Limited, 2001 D.R.T.C. 91 at page 99 (Cal.)
Madras High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - M Venugopal - Full Document
1