Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.81 seconds)
Documents citing Mrs. Santosh Tangri vs Ved Matta on 30 October, 2002

Unknown vs Rt on 1 June, 2016

48. Significantly though the tenant chose not to rt appear as a witness, but through her power of attorney i.e. Shiv Kumar Kaushal (Respondent No. 2) admitted it to be so. In fact, she also examined Anuj Rana (RW-1) for establishing the fact that noodles for running the business stood supplied by him. The Courts below concurrently have disbelieved the version of Swaroop Kumar (RW-2) and Shiv Kumar Kaushal (RW-3) to the effect that subsequently such business stood closed. In any case, such fact would not have any bearing on the outcome of the present petition, for all that is required to be seen is as to whether prior to the filing of the eviction petition, tenant subjected herself for eviction, with a right accruing in favour of the landlord under the Act. [Mrs. Santosh Tangri vs. Ved Matta, 2002 (2) ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 20:30:17 :::HCHP 40 RCR (Rent) 657; M/s Goyal Steel Industries & others vs. Sangram Singh Sandhawalia & others, 2005 (1) RCR (Rent) .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 67 - Cited by 0 - S Karol - Full Document

Unknown vs Rt on 1 June, 2016

48. Significantly though the tenant chose not to rt appear as a witness, but through her power of attorney i.e. Shiv Kumar Kaushal (Respondent No. 2) admitted it to be so. In fact, she also examined Anuj Rana (RW-1) for establishing the fact that noodles for running the business stood supplied by him. The Courts below concurrently have disbelieved the version of Swaroop Kumar (RW-2) and Shiv Kumar Kaushal (RW-3) to the effect that subsequently such business stood closed. In any case, such fact would not have any bearing on the outcome of the present petition, for all that is required to be seen is as to whether prior to the filing of the eviction petition, tenant subjected herself for eviction, with a right accruing in favour of the landlord under the Act. [Mrs. Santosh Tangri vs. Ved Matta, 2002 (2) ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 20:30:19 :::HCHP 40 RCR (Rent) 657; M/s Goyal Steel Industries & others vs. Sangram Singh Sandhawalia & others, 2005 (1) RCR (Rent) .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 67 - Cited by 0 - S Karol - Full Document
1