M/S Kothari Inter Group Ltd vs M/S Vinayaka Enterprises on 28 January, 2013
That doubt is now clarified by the decision in
SURESH BABU's case. The cut-off date has been specified
as 1.11.1996.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.44 seconds)Documents citing
Suresh Babu vs Smt. S. Susheela Thimmegowda on 12 November, 1998
Smt. Indira Rao (Deceased) By L.Rs And ... vs West Coast Paper Mills Limited, ... on 17 November, 1998
Further, the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Suresh Babu v Smt. S. Susheela Thimmegowda, to which I am a party, has taken the similar view. At paragraphs 16.1, 16.2 and 16.3 of the order, this Court has observed as follows:
S. Balasubramaniyam vs P. Janakaraju And Anr. on 29 April, 2004
9. The contention that the proceedings for eviction initiated against the Respondents were void ab initio, is liable to be rejected. Such a contention was considered and rejected in SURESH BABU (supra) relied on by the Respondents. This Court held:
State Of Kerala vs M/S.Harrison Malayalam Ltd on 31 January, 2011
8. Another decision relied upon by the learned counsel for
the respondent is Suresh Babu v. Smt.S.Susheela Thimmegowda
[ILR 1998 Kar. 3885]. The matter arose under the Karnataka Rent
Control Act. The Act prohibited the eviction of the tenants except in
S.T.Rev.202 of 2010 &
connected cases - 6 -
Rashtrapal Rama Ingle vs Central Railway on 24 February, 2023
ma
ae
i. L look towar
ia fhe case of Suresh Babe vs Smt. S. Susheela Thimmnegowda
rendered on 12 November, 1998, ILR 1998 KAR 3885 ;
1