V.Santhanam vs )The Presiding Officer on 12 April, 2019
7. The petitioners submit that the 1st respondent Labour
Court ought to have framed and decided the correct issues which
arose in their cases viz “whether there was a conciliation
proceedings pending at the time of the dismissal of the
petitioners and the date when the conciliation proceedings
actually commenced” instead of the faulty question “whether a
conciliation proceedings could be said to have legally
commenced, when the strike notice given by the Union to the
Conciliation officer at Virudhunagar was defective” and wrongly
relying on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in
2008 (2) LLN page 761 Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., vs.
Tamil Nadu Labour Welfare Board.