Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.21 seconds)

Cosco (India) Limited vs Paramsukh Nirman Pvt. Ltd. on 31 July, 2019

8. On the other hand, ld. counsel for the Defendant has submitted that the various reasons for the delay have been contained in the application for condonation, which have also been captured by the Joint Registrar. She places reliance on Chapter IV Rule 3 of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018 as also Chapter I Rule 14. The submission that she makes is that since the admission/denial affidavit was finally brought with the written statement within a period of 30 days from the initial filing, it would have at best been defect being cured and not a non-filing. She further submits that under Rule 14, the Court has the power to dispense with compliance with the rules. Ld. counsel also relies upon the recent judgment in Atlanta Limited v. National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited and Ors. in CS (COMM) 1231/2018 decided on 9th July, 2019.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - P M Singh - Full Document
1