Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.87 seconds)

Andhra Pradesh State Co-Operative Bank ... vs Co-Operative Tribunal And Ors. on 6 August, 2002

38. Equally, the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in Indian Bank, Madras v. N.Munisankar , is of no relevance to the questions arising in this case. This decision was considering the question whether the interest should be awarded on the principal sum borrowed or on the amount adjudged. The provisions of Section 34 CPC were considered in that context, which is not the issue before this Court, in the case on hand.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - G Raghuram - Full Document

Andhra Bank At Vikarabad vs Manneguda Polishing Stones Industries ... on 10 December, 2004

4. Learned Counsel for the appellant bank, Sri S.P. Sarveswara Murthy, placed strong reliance on Section 34 read with Order XXXIV Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) and contends that in relation to a commercial transaction the discretion vested in the Civil Court in the matter of awarding interest has to be within the parameters of proviso to Section 34 CPC and therefore the Trial Court erred in restricting interest pendente lite and post decree at 6% per annum. He placed reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Central Bank of India v. Ravindra, , as well as decision of this Court in Indian Bank, Madras v. N. Munisankar, (DB) and Sri Panduranga Traders v. State Bank of India, Vatluru Branch, W.G. Dist., (DB).
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 11 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1