Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 32 (0.67 seconds)
Documents citing Nidhi vs Ram Kripal Sharma (D) Thr. Lrs on 7 February, 2017

Shyam Chandra And Ors. vs District Judge Sultanpur And 2 Ors. on 11 July, 2024

20. The submission of learned counsel for petitioner that the rights of the parties stand crystallized by institution of the suit and the subsequent development could not be seen by placing reliance upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Nidhi versus Ram Kripal (supra). The relevant extract of the said judgment is quoted herein below:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - M Kumar - Full Document

Sadanand Krishnaji Kirloskar vs Tolakchand Genyorom Doshi And Ors on 14 September, 2017

In any case, Mr. Gokhale submits that subsequent developments must be of such nature as eclipse the bona fide and reasonable need of the landlord. He submits that in the course of a litigation which runs over decades some events are bound to take place. But, he submits that it is not the law that cognizance is required to take of all such events so as to deprive the landlord, for no fault on his part of the fruits of the decree of eviction already made by the trial Court on legal and cogent grounds. Mr. Gokhale placed reliance on the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Nidhi vs. Ram Kripal Sharma (Dead) through Legal Representatives4 and Gaya Prasad vs. Pradeep Srivastava5.
Bombay High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - M S Sonak - Full Document

Tolakchand Gangaram Doshi (Sinde ... vs Sadanand Krishnaji Kirloskar on 14 September, 2017

In any case, Mr. Gokhale submits that subsequent developments must be of such nature as eclipse the bona fide and reasonable need of the landlord. He submits that in the course of a litigation which runs over decades some events are bound to take place. But, he submits that it is not the law that cognizance is required to take of all such events so as to deprive the landlord, for no fault on his part of the fruits of the decree of eviction already made by the trial Court on legal and cogent grounds. Mr. Gokhale placed reliance on the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Nidhi vs. Ram Kripal Sharma (Dead) through Legal Representatives4 and Gaya Prasad vs. Pradeep Srivastava5.
Bombay High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

Hari Shanker Rastogi vs Allahabad Bank on 19 September, 2017

12. Supreme Court recently in Nidhi Vs. Ram Kripal Sharma (2017) 5 SCC 640 has held that marriage of a female does not come in the way of the petition for eviction filed by her before her marriage for requirement of self and for members of her family and marriage of a female cannot be permitted to defeat the petition for eviction. In that case, the female, post marriage was not even residing in the same city. It was held that it is for the landlord to decide what he wants to do with the property.
Delhi High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - R S Endlaw - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next