Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.37 seconds)
Documents citing Gurpreet Singh vs M/S Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. & Anr. on 2 August, 2010

M/S Sangam Enterprises vs M/S Drj Chemicals (P) Ltd on 29 October, 2011

Complainant was also directed to file the affidavit and matter was fixed for complainant's evidence again and again and vide order dated 25/11/10, Ld Trial Court observed that there is no necessity to continue complainant's evidence and in view of section 145(1) of N.I. Act and further relying upon judgment filed i.e. Rajesh Aggarwal Vs State and also relying upon Gurpreet Vs Ranbaxy, accused was directed to lead defence evidence and on 18/12/10, defence evidence of accused was closed.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rakesh Kumar vs Amarnath Malhotra on 18 July, 2013

Ld Magistrate in his judgemnt has relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble Delhi High Court on the issue Org Informatics Ltd Vs State and Anr Crl M.C. No 2409/2011 decided on 01/08/2011; M/s mandvi Co­op Bank Ltd vs Nimesh B Thaore, (2010)3SCC83; Gurpreet Singh vs Ranbaxy ltd decided by Hon'ble High Court on 02/08/2010; M/s Kaluch Paper House & Anr Vs M/s Mahavir Papers & Anr Cr MC No 3687 of 2009 decided by Hon'ble High Court on 02/08/2010.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Sangam Enterprises vs M/S Drj Chemicals (P) Ltd on 29 October, 2011

Complainant was also directed to file the affidavit and matter was fixed for complainant's evidence again and again and vide order dated 25/11/10, Ld Trial Court observed that there is no necessity to continue complainant's evidence and in view of section 145(1) of N.I. Act and further relying upon judgment filed i.e. Rajesh Aggarwal Vs State and also relying upon Gurpreet Vs Ranbaxy, accused was directed to lead defence evidence and on 18/12/10, defence evidence of accused was closed.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Sangam Enterprises vs M/S Drj Chemicals (P) Ltd on 29 October, 2011

Complainant was also directed to file the affidavit and matter was fixed for complainant's evidence again and again and vide order dated 25/11/10, Ld Trial Court observed that there is no necessity to continue complainant's evidence and in view of section 145(1) of N.I. Act and further relying upon judgment filed i.e. Rajesh Aggarwal Vs State and also relying upon Gurpreet Vs Ranbaxy, accused was directed to lead defence evidence and on 18/12/10, defence evidence of accused was closed.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Sangam Enterprises vs M/S Drj Chemicals (P) Ltd on 29 October, 2011

Complainant was also directed to file the affidavit and matter was fixed for complainant's evidence again and again and vide order dated 25/11/10, Ld Trial Court observed that there is no necessity to continue complainant's evidence and in view of section 145(1) of N.I. Act and further relying upon judgment filed i.e. Rajesh Aggarwal Vs State and also relying upon Gurpreet Vs Ranbaxy, accused was directed to lead defence evidence and on 18/12/10, defence evidence of accused was closed.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Revolution Clothings Pvt. Ltd. & Ors vs Shefali Modi on 20 May, 2014

In support of the submissions the reference has been made to a number of judgments (Gurpreet Singh Vs. Ranbaxy Labortary, Kalucha Paper House Vs. Mahavir Papers, Rajesh Aggarwal Vs. State, Madan Agarwal Vs. State, United Ink & Vanish Vs. State, Pratibha Pandurang Salvi Vs. State, 6 Paskura Cold Storage Vs. Sri Sujit Kumar Maity and Nitinbhai Saevatilal Shah & Anr. Vs. Manubhai Manjibhai Panchal & Anr.) I would like to make reference to the judgment of Hon'ble High Court in the case of Rajesh Aggarwal Vs. State Crl. M.C No.1700/2009 & Crl. M.A No.6166/2009 wherein it was laid down :
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rakesh Kumar vs Mukesh Malhotra on 19 July, 2013

Ld Magistrate in his judgemnt has relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble Delhi High Court on the issue Org Informatics Ltd Vs State and Anr Crl M.C. No 2409/2011 decided on 01/08/2011; M/s mandvi Co­op Bank Ltd vs Nimesh B Thaore, (2010)3SCC83; Gurpreet Singh vs Ranbaxy ltd decided by Hon'ble High Court on 02/08/2010; M/s Kaluch Paper House & Anr Vs M/s Mahavir Papers & Anr Cr MC No 3687 of 2009 decided by Hon'ble High Court on 02/08/2010.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1