Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (1.08 seconds)
Documents citing Thoothukudi Nazareth Diocese vs The Church Of South India on 27 August, 2009

Mr.R.Jayakumar Jayaraj vs The Deputy Inspector General Of Police on 31 May, 2017

3. W.P(MD)No.21134 of 2017 has been filed seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities 1 to 13 to take necessary action to enable and ensure the administrative committee appointed by the CSI Synod to exercise its power as affirmed by the Honourable Division Bench of this Court in the judgment in Thoothukudi – Nazareth Diocese & another v. The Church of South India and another reported in 2009 (4) LW 742, vide its proceedings dated 31.05.2017, over the administrations and management of the 14th respondent Diocese and its educational and health care institutions.
Madras High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

Mr.R.Jayakumar Jayaraj vs The Deputy Inspector General Of Police on 31 May, 2017

3. W.P(MD)No.21134 of 2017 has been filed seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities 1 to 13 to take necessary action to enable and ensure the administrative committee appointed by the CSI Synod to exercise its power as affirmed by the Honourable Division Bench of this Court in the judgment in Thoothukudi – Nazareth Diocese & another v. The Church of South India and another reported in 2009 (4) LW 742, vide its proceedings dated 31.05.2017, over the administrations and management of the 14th respondent Diocese and its educational and health care institutions.
Madras High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 23 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

Cdr. V.Joshua vs M/S Jal Vayu Vihar Apartments on 18 November, 2017

26. And even in another ruling of Thoothukudi Nazareth Diocese Vs. The Church Of South India one relied on by the plaintiff, the Hon'ble High Court of Madras has also held that, "Order 1 Rule 8 of CPC says that, where there are numerous persons having the same interest in one suit, one or more of such persons may, with the permission of the 20 OS.No.9243/2006 court sue or be sued or may defend such suit on behalf of or for the benefit of all the persons so interested. Section 26 of CPC reads every suit shall be instituted by the presentation of the plaint or in such other manner as may be prescribed. As per the above provisions, the institution of such a suit must be with permission of the court and the suit without getting permission of the court under Order 1 Rule 8 of CPC cannot be maintained. So long as the permission was not sought for and obtained and not even applied for it cannot be stated that there was a suit properly filed."
Bangalore District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1