Pushap Lata vs Varun Singla on 17 December, 2024
13. In view of the aforesaid admitted facts, this Court is of the
considered opinion that the cancellation of agreement to sell vide
communication dated 6th of December, 2009, stands aborted by the conduct
of defendant once she claims to have appeared before the Sub Registrar on
15th of December, 2009 to perform her part. Hence, this Court finds that the
ratio of law laid down in the case of I.S. Sikandar vs. K. Subramani and
others (supra) and that in Anita G. Hawa vs. Navtej Singh Bains (supra) is
not applicable to the present case as the cancellation of the agreement to sell
has been condoned by the defendant herself.