Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 57 (2.12 seconds)

M.Sugadha Kumar vs The State Of Kerala on 22 September, 2025

11. In Ext.P4 order, the Tribunal found that the Government has fixed the date as 01.04.2013 for introduction of 8 OP(KAT)No.437 of 2022 2025:KER:70752 National Pension Scheme after elaborate discussions. As held by the Apex Court in the judgment in State of West Bengal v. Ratan Behari Dey [(1993) 4 SCC 62] as well as the judgment in Mohammad Ali Imam v. State of Bihar [(2020) 5 SCC 62] where the aforesaid judgment has been relied on, the conditions of service are subject to changes and even the employees who entered service cannot claim those service conditions without any alteration. Even after the appointment it is up to the Government to alter the service conditions including those relating to pension and pensionary benefits, on valid reasons. The petitioner-applicant got appointment as Municipal Secretary Gr.III, pursuant to his inclusion in Annexure A2 ranked list, only on 09.05.2017. His entry into service is much after 01.04.2013, the date on which National Pension Scheme was introduced.
Kerala High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document

Bharti Airtel Limited vs Union Of India, Delhi on 21 December, 2021

19. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Union of India has cited Mohd. Ali Imam & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar; (2020) 5 SCC 685, through its Chief 14 Secretary & Ors. In this case retired employees challenged a cut-off date fixed by the Government of Bihar for extending a beneficial scheme for the employees from a retrospective date when the Cabinet had taken a decision in favour of such a scheme. Those who had retired earlier to the cut-off date wanted to be included but the Court found no illegality in the cut-off from a particular date when the Cabinet had taken a decision in favour of such a scheme.
Telecom Disputes Settlement Tribunal Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - S K Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next