Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.24 seconds)

Gudibanda Ramchandar Rao vs Garika Venkata Sambaiah And 2 Others on 23 November, 2022

11. In the instant case, the court below has not only committed illegality and irregularity but also passed an irregular order of granting ex-parte ad-interim injunction order without recording any reasons and without satisfying the essential principles for grant of ad-interim injunction and simultaneously ordering police protection in favour of the plaintiff restraining the defendants. The court below has committed error in passing the orders and simultaneously granting ad-interim injunction and police protection before passing the final order in I.A.No.276 of 2020 on merits. At this state, it is apt to refer the decision relied on by the learned counsel for the petitioner in SENTHAN PROPERTIES, HYDERABAD's case (supra), wherein it is held that :
Telangana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Anjay Kumar Omar vs State Of U.P. And 7 Others on 31 January, 2023

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that despite service upon the defendants-respondents in the suit, they have deliberately avoided to appear as they knew very well that they had nothing to do with the property in question and were just interfering with the on going construction activity of the petitioner over the suit property. The temporary injunction was granted by the trial court and when the petitioner moved an application for getting the temporary injunction order implemented, the trial court refused to allow that application on the ground that 6-C application was still not disposed of and therefore to get the interim relief order enforced at this stage would be in the teeth of the judgment of Telangana High Court in the case of M/s Senthan Properties vs. M/S S.V.S. Infra Services Private Ltd. reported in AIR 2021 Telangana 107.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document
1