Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.45 seconds)
Documents citing Nanak Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Another on 17 January, 2014

Ashok Kumar vs Sheela And Others on 23 February, 2016

In view of the observations made by this Court in FAO No.5181 of 2010, titled as Nanak Singh and another Vs. State of Punjab JYOTI 2016.03.02 17:00 and another decided on 17.01.2014 whereby ".....keeping in view the I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document HIGH COURT CHANDIGARH FAO No.4981 of 2011 (O&M) 8 conflicting decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and taking support from the decision of Division Bench of our High Court in United India Insurance Company Limited v Raj Rani 1998 (1) ACJ 175, in my considered view, the age of the deceased as well as the age group of the claimants is required to be taken into consideration while adopting a multiplier for determining the dependency to award compensation to the claimant." I find this argument to be valid. Therefore, I hold the multiplier of 17 should be applied.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Kalawati And Another vs Sh. Chaman Lal And Others on 12 February, 2014

Keeping in view the entire conspectus of facts, I award `50,000/- on account of loss of love and affection to the appellant No.1- mother. I further hold that multiplier of 15 has to be applied instead of 11 in view of the observations made by this Court in F.A.O. No.5181 of 2010, titled as Nanak Singh and another vs. State of Punjab and another, decided on 17.01.2014.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The New India Assurance Company Limited vs Dharampal And Others on 22 January, 2014

There is merit in both the sets of arguments. The argument of the learned counsel for the appellant-insurance company with regard to the earning has to be accepted. Consequently, it has to be held that the income of both the deceased was `5358/- p.m. However, as held in the above cited judgments an amount of 50% has to be given for future prospects that would make the monthly income of `8037/- p.m. in each case. I further hold that multiplier of 15 has to be applied instead of 18 in the case of deceased Kuldeep (in FAO No.5417 of 2013) and multiplier of 16 has to be applied instead of 18 in the case of deceased Jaswinder (in FAO No.5418 of 2013) in view of the observations made by this Court in F.A.O. No.5181 of 2010, titled as Nanak Singh and another vs. State of Punjab and another, decided on 17.01.2014. In both the cases the deduction of 50% as adopted by the Tribunal cannot be interfered with. The argument of learned counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2 that under the conventional heads the total amount of `1,25,000/- should be paid is accepted in each case. As per the learned counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2 the interest @ 6% p.a. is also highly inadequate. I find this argument to be correct also. The interest is increased to 9% p.a in each case. The management and apportionment of Sharma Ashish 2014.03.11 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh FAO No.5417 of 2013 (O&M) -4- the enhanced amount would be as per the direction of the Tribunal.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Santosh Jain And Another vs State Of Haryana And Others on 13 February, 2014

In the circumstances, the multiplier of 15 is ordered in view of the observations made by this Court in F.A.O. No.5181 of 2010, titled as Nanak Singh and another vs. State of Punjab and another, decided on 17.01.2014. I also award a sum of `1 lac to the mother-appellant No.1 on account of loss of love and affection. I further award `15,000/- more towards funeral expenses and last rites.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

United India Insurance Co. Ltd vs Chhailu And Others on 19 February, 2014

Keeping in view the entire conspectus of facts, I award `1 lac to the respondent No.2-mother on account of loss of love and affection. I further hold that multiplier of 15 has to be applied instead of 8 in view of the observations made by this Court in F.A.O. No.5181 of 2010, titled as Nanak Singh and another vs. State of Punjab and another, decided on 17.01.2014. I further award `10,000/- more towards funeral expenses and transportation. It is made clear that all the enhanced amount shall be paid along with the same rate of interest as awarded by the Tribunal from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of realization. Apart from the individual amount awarded, apportionment and management of the compensation would be as per the direction of the Tribunal.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chhailu And Anr vs Ashok Kumar And Anr on 23 January, 2024

I further hold that multiplier of 15 has to be applied instead of 8 in view of the observations made by this Court in F.A.O. No.5181 of 2010, titled as Nanak Singh and another vs. State of Punjab and another, decided on 17.01.2014. I further award Rs.10,000/- more towards funeral expenses and transportation. It is made clear that all the enhanced amount shall be paid along with the same rate of interest as awarded by the Tribunal from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of realization. Apart from the individual amount awarded, apportionment and management of the compensation would be as per the Yogesh Sharma 2024.01.24 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - A Sarin - Full Document

Bhajan Singh And Another vs Baldev Singh And Others on 13 February, 2014

In the circumstances, the dependency would work out to `900/- p.m. I further hold that multiplier of 16 has to be applied in view of the observations made by this Court in F.A.O. No.5181 of 2010, Sharma Ashish 2014.03.19 12:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh FAO No.3318 of 2004 (O&M) -3- titled as Nanak Singh and another vs. State of Punjab and another, decided on 17.01.2014. I further award an amount of `1 lac to the appellant No.2-mother on account of loss of love and affection. I further award an amount of `10,000/- more towards funeral expenses. It is made clear that the amount already awarded is set off against the amount to be paid now. Apart from the individual amount awarded on account of loss of love and affection, the enhanced amount would have to be deposited in a fixed deposit in the name of the appellant No.2 for a period of three years and she would be entitled to monthly interest thereon.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Manpreet Kaur And Another vs Pepsu Road Transport Corporation on 12 February, 2014

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, I further hold that multiplier of 13 has to be applied in view of the Sharma Ashish 2014.03.19 12:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh FAO No.5340 of 2006 (O&M) -3- observations made by this Court in F.A.O. No.5181 of 2010, titled as Nanak Singh and another vs. State of Punjab and another, decided on 17.01.2014.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next