Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (3.77 seconds)

Thangapalam vs The Secretary To Government on 8 September, 2014

18. The subjective satisfaction arrived at by the detaining authority on this aspect, cannot be said to be unreasonable, or beyond the comprehension of any reasonable person. Consideration of the bail orders granted even in grave offences and the habituality and continuity of the offences, even though recourse to normal law is taken, are cogent materials, relevant to arrive at the subjective satisfaction of any reasonable man to think that there is a possibility of coming out on bail, if applications are filed. We have addressed this issue, in our recent judgment in Mariappan vs. District Collector and District Magistrate, Tirunelveli District, (HCP.No.244 of 2014, dated 18.08.2014) and the said decision, squarely applies to this case also. Extract of some passages of the said decision would be relevant for this case also.
Madras High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kosalai vs The Secretary To Government on 8 September, 2014

18. The subjective satisfaction arrived at by the detaining authority on this aspect, cannot be said to be unreasonable, or beyond the comprehension of any reasonable person. Consideration of the bail orders granted even in grave offences and the habituality and continuity of the offences, even though recourse to normal law is taken, are cogent materials, relevant to arrive at the subjective satisfaction of any reasonable man to think that there is a possibility of coming out on bail, if bail applications are filed. We have addressed this issue, in our recent judgment in Mariappan vs. District Collector and District Magistrate, Tirunelveli District, (HCP.No.244 of 2014, dated 18.08.2014) and the said decision, squarely applies to this case also. Extract of some passages of the said decision would be relevant for this case also.
Madras High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gnanasundari vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 14 March, 2023

8.This Court in an earlier occasion has considered and decided that the similar case theory need not be a similar set of facts, verbatim and in this context, it can be very useful to refer the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court made in H.C.P.(MD)No.244 of 2014 dated 18.08.2014 in the matter of Mariappan Vs. District Collector and District Magistrate, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli and others, where the Division Bench of this Court has stated the following:-
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - R S Kumar - Full Document
1