Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.81 seconds)
Documents citing Ritesh Babbar vs Kiran Babbar on 10 March, 2022

Nishkal Singampalli, vs Kannepamula Vijaya Kumar on 10 February, 2025

5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-husband submits that the appeal is time barred and the trial Court has recorded its observation that the acts of the appellant-wife have caused mental cruelty. The respondent-husband wanted to have children but it is the appellant-wife who is not willing for the same which amounts to mental cruelty and the trial Court has recorded the findings that the respondent-husband and his family members made efforts to resolve the dispute. Learned counsel placed reliance on the decisions in 'Arunoday Singh vs. Lee Anne Elton 1, Sandeep Mohan Verghese vs. Anjana Jose 2 and Ritesh Babbar vs. Kiran Babbar 3. 1 2021 SCC OnLine SC 3285 2 2011 (1) DMC 364 = 2010:KER:34522 3 2022 SCC OnLine Delhi 726 = 2022:DHC:894-DB
Telangana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ms. Sharanjit Kaur Kohli vs Ramandeep Singh Kohli on 9 May, 2025

In view of the law laid down in the Judgments mentioned hereinabove, we find that the learned Family Court has rightly dissolved the marriage of the parties by holding that the allegations of cruelty being proved on the evidence adduced by the parties before it. The series of incidents of physical cruelty besides mental cruelty duly prove the escalated acrimonious and bitter relations between the parties. Furthermore, the factum of the parties living separately for a long time period of time, that is around ten years now, without any resumption of marital cohabitation between the parties, can also be considered as an added ground while deciding the divorce petition.
Delhi High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - N Chawla - Full Document

Anita Sharma vs Naresh Kumar Sharma on 1 July, 2025

42. Furthermore, this Court in the case titled Ritesh Babbar v Kiran Signature Not Verified MAT.APP.(F.C.) 160/2025 Page 15 of 17 Signed By:PALLAVI VERMA Signing Date:01.07.2025 17:23:39 Babbar, 2022 SCC OnLine Del 726, has held that as the parties had lived separately for 12 long years, there was no chance of reconciliation. It was further observed therein that no useful purpose would be served by maintaining the matrimonial bond and hence, divorce was granted.
Delhi High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - N Chawla - Full Document

Soumitra Rai vs Rupa Rai on 13 July, 2022

Further in a mere recent decision reported in AIR 2022 Delhi 72 (Ritesh Babbar versus Kiran Babbar) the Delhi High Court relying on the decision of Supreme Court in 7 K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa (Supra) has held that making unfounded allegations against the spouse or his relatives in pleadings, filing of complaints etc., which may have adverse impact on the job of the spouse in the facts of a case amounts to causing mental cruelty to the other spouse and the same view was expressed by the Supreme Court in K. Srinivas v. K. Suneetha (2014) 16 SCC 34 .
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1