citedby: 94484060

Purushottam Dev Arya vs Cbi on 23 February, 2017

5. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Maneesh Goomer's case (supra) has held that Section 195 Cr.P.C. has not been correspondingly amended so as to include section 174-A I.P.C., which was brought into the Penal Code with effect from 23rd June 2006 and there is no reason to deviate with the view of Hon'ble Delhi High Court."

Delhi High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 2 - S P Garg - Full Document

A Krishna Reddy vs Cbi Thr. Director on 23 February, 2017

5. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Maneesh Goomer's case (supra) has held that Section 195 Cr.P.C. has not been correspondingly amended so as to include section 174-A I.P.C., which was brought into the Penal Code with effect from 23rd June 2006 and there is no reason to deviate with the view of Hon'ble Delhi High Court."

Delhi High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 7 - S P Garg - Full Document

State vs Tasleem on 2 August, 2024

5. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Maneesh Goomer's case (supra) has held that Section 195 Cr.P.C. has not been correspondingly amended so as to include section 174-A I.P.C., which was brought into the Penal Code with effect from 23rd FIR No.14/07 State vs. Tasleem & Ors.. PS Seelampur Page No.22 of 26 June 2006 and there is no reason to deviate with the view of Hon'ble Delhi High Court."

Delhi District Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of Nct Of Delhi vs Proclaimed Offenders on 9 August, 2024

In Maneesh Goomer (supra), it is pertinent to note that there was no FIR in existence and the complaint case had already been withdrawn on account of compromise. Since the offence under Section 174A of the IPC was a distinct offence, therefore, the Coordinate Bench held that FIR can be registered separately. The judgment does not say that a separate FIR has to be registered as a rule. The facts in the present case are clearly distinguishable.

Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - A Sharma - Full Document