Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.94 seconds)
Documents citing Mr.Jayantilal M Mistry vs Reserve Bank Of India on 1 November, 2011

T V Sudhakar vs Reserve Bank Of India on 14 July, 2022

7. The Commission, after hearing the submissions of both the parties and after perusal of records, observes that the original RTI applicant has sought information regarding details of top 100 accounts of loan defaulters with highest amounts of outstanding debt as on 31.10.2019 etc. The CPIO, Reserve Bank of India had issued notices under Section 11(1) and 11(3) to the appellant bank intending to disclose the information. Aggrieved by the decision of the CPIO, the appellant bank had filed first appeal with the First Appellate Authority. The FAA had also dismissed the first appeal of the appellant bank summarily. The Commission observes that the RTI applicant had insisted for disclosure of information as per Jayantilal N. Mistry's case. The Appellant Bank contested that the information sought as a whole is exempted from disclosure under Section 8 (1) (j), Section 8(1) (d) and 8(1) (h) of the RTI Act and that the CPIO/FAA has not passed any reasoned order settling their objections nor gave any opportunity of hearing to them.
Central Information Commission Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - N K Gupta - Full Document

Babu Rao vs Reserve Bank Of India on 25 January, 2021

6. The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing both the parties and perusal of records, notes that RBI expressed their desire to disclose the information sought by the original applicant i.e., Mr. Rahil Shah on the basis of the observations made by the Hon'ble Supreme court in Jayantilal N. Misty & Anr. vs. Reserve Bank of India in Page 4 of 6 16.12.2015.
Central Information Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Chandra - Full Document

Babu Rao vs Reserve Bank Of India on 23 June, 2021

"The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing both the parties and perusal of records, notes that RBI expressed their desire to disclose the information sought by the original applicant i.e., Mr. Rahil Shah on the basis of the observations made by the Hon'ble Supreme court in Jayantilal N. Misty & Anr. vs. Reserve Bank of India in 16.12.2015.
Central Information Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S Chandra - Full Document

Vihar Durve vs State Bank Of India on 24 January, 2023

5. The appellant submitted that no information has been provided to him by the respondent on his RTI application dated 04.03.2021. The appellant submitted that the information sought by him is in larger public interest, therefore, complete and correct information should be provided to him. The appellant further referred to the decision given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Jayantilal Mistry Vs. Reserve Bank of India in support of his arguments.
Central Information Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - N K Gupta - Full Document

Munna Prasad vs Reserve Bank Of India on 20 August, 2020

6. The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing the respondent and perusal of records, observed that the respondent claimed to have replied vide letter dated 12.04.2018 wherein information was denied. However, the respondent have undertaken during the course of hearing to disclose the information in view of the legal position laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jayantilal Mistry v. Reserve Bank of India. In view of this, the respondent is directed to re-visit the RTI application and provide the information to the appellant within three weeks from date of receipt of this order.
Central Information Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S Chandra - Full Document

T V Sudhakar vs Reserve Bank Of India on 25 February, 2021

6. The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing both the parties and perusal of records, notes that RBI expressed their desire to disclose the information sought by the original applicant i.e., Shri Kabir Agarwal on the basis of the observations made by the Hon'ble Supreme court in Jayantilal N. Mistry & Anr. vs. Reserve Bank of India in 16.12.2015.
Central Information Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Chandra - Full Document
1