Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.68 seconds)
Documents citing Swaran Singh vs Punjab State Electricity Board, ... on 10 February, 2000

Perminder Singh vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 29 August, 2023

14. This Court in judgment dated 8.9.2015 rendered in 2015(41) RCR(Civil) 907 titled as Swaran Singh versus State of Punjab and another held that even a KAMAL KUMAR 2023.08.29 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-14431-2017 (O&M) 7 2023:PHHC:112863 single day's absence without intimation in case of a member of a disciplined force cannot be ignored.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - G S Gill - Full Document

Satnam Singh vs Union Territory on 7 September, 2012

22. First of all, we will deal with the issue of validity of the Degrees / Diplomas obtained by the applicants from Institute of advance Studies in Education Gandhi Vidya Mandir, Sardarshahr (Rajasthan), a Deemed University, on the ground that degree obtained by Distance Education Mode cannot be treated as equivalent to degree obtained through regular classes. We need not delve into this issue any more in view of latest dictum of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in C.W.P. No. 6243 of 2010 titled Swaran Singh and Others Vs. The Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala decided on 27.1.2012 in which similar issue was involved regarding validity of degree of B.Tech from the same University. The Court negatived the objection taken by the State that the degrees granted through distance education cannot be equivalent to regular course. The Court was not shown any particular prohibition against Deemed University having Distance Education Programme under any provision of the UGC Act to disqualify a person for consideration. Directions were issued to the respondent in that case that petitioners would be treated as duly eligible for consideration for promotion.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of Haryana vs Rajender Prasad on 12 December, 2025

In Man Singh (supra) which was also a case of BSNL, this Court had granted compensation of Rs.2 Lakh to each of the workmen when they had worked for merely 240 days. Since the respondent herein worked for longer period, we are of the view that he should be paid a compensation of Rs. 3 lakhs. This compensation should be paid within 2 months failing which the respondent shall also be entitled to interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of this judgment. Award of the CGIT is modified to this extent. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms. The respondent shall also be entitled to the cost of Rs.15,000/-(Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) in this appeal."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1