Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.45 seconds)Documents citing
Santineer Vincent Rajkumar vs R.Rejitha on 3 August, 2017
D.Karthikeyan vs S.Vatshala on 4 December, 2019
3.The learned Judge of this Court in a decision reported
in [2017 (5) CTC 515, Santineer Vincent Rajkumar Vs.
R.Rejitha] held as follows:-
Susila Rani vs Arumai Ammal Ponselvi on 3 December, 2019
3. The Hon'ble Supreme Court held that a person who
is not part of the shared household ought not to be made as
respondent in the proceedings under the Protection of Women
from Domestic Violence Act 2005. The petitioner's counsel
brought to my notice a decision reported in 2017 (5) CTC
515(Santineer Vincent Rajkumar V. R.Rejitha) held as
follows:-
Biresh Rodrigo vs Mary Minitha on 3 December, 2019
4. The Madras High Court in the decision reported in
2017 (5) CTC 515(Santineer Vincent Rajkumar V. R.Rejitha)
held as follows:-
J.Marli vs R.Rajeswari on 13 February, 2020
3. The Hon'ble Supreme Court held that a person who
is not part of the shared household ought not to be made as
respondent in the proceedings under the Protection of Women
from Domestic Violence Act 2005. The petitioners' counsel
brought to my notice a decision reported in 2017 (5) CTC
515(Santineer Vincent Rajkumar V. R.Rejitha) held as
follows:-
Jayarani vs Sindhu Maheswari on 27 November, 2019
3. The petitioner's counsel brought to my notice a
decision reported in 2017 (5) CTC 515(Santineer Vincent
Rajkumar V. R.Rejitha) held as follows:-
Muthusamy vs Rajagenkeshkumar on 6 June, 2023
9.Dealing with an identical situation, this Court in Santineer Vincent
Rajkumar and another vs. R.Rejitha reported in 2017 (5) CTC 515, has quashed
the proceedings pending against the petitioners therein in S.T.C.No.10791 of 2013,
on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Alandur, after following the decision of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Preeti Gupta and another vs. State of Jharkhand
and another reported in 2010 (7) SCC 667, wherein at Paragraph 35, it has been
held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, as under:-
Muthusamy vs Rajagenkeshkumar on 6 June, 2023
9.Dealing with an identical situation, this Court in Santineer Vincent
Rajkumar and another vs. R.Rejitha reported in 2017 (5) CTC 515, has quashed
the proceedings pending against the petitioners therein in S.T.C.No.10791 of 2013,
on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Alandur, after following the decision of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Preeti Gupta and another vs. State of Jharkhand
and another reported in 2010 (7) SCC 667, wherein at Paragraph 35, it has been
held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, as under:-
S.Sirajudeen vs Mrs.Syed Nisha on 23 February, 2018
5.In the above situation, it is necessary to look into the judgment of
this Court in Santineer Vincent Rajkumar and another Vs. R.Rejitha reported
in 2017 (2) TNLR 885 (Mad), wherein this Court has held as follows:
Chinna Sakkaiah vs Angala Eswari on 23 February, 2018
In this situation, it is relevant to refer the judgment of this
Court in Santineer Vincent Rajkumar and another Vs. R.Rejitha reported in
2017 (2) TNLR 885 (Mad), wherein at Paragraphs Nos.18 and 19, it has been
held as follows: