Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.40 seconds)
Documents citing Lakshmi Chand vs Union Of India & Others on 22 September, 2011

Ram Saroop vs . Uoi on 8 April, 2016

Evide nce ­ 4.2 In order to establish the issues, the petitioner was given opportunity to lead evidence. Petitioner no. 1's LR Tek Chand/PW­1 entered into witness box, he also tendered copies of judgments LAC No. 292/11 Hari Kishan/Hari Kishan (Ex. PW­1/6) of village Kilokari of same area and award, under section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, besides judgments on surrounding areas {which were passed by Ld. Predecessor in case LAC No. 74/08 Lakhmi Chand & others Vs Union of India & another (Ex. PW­1/3); LAC No. 75/08 Smt. Sudesh Bhatia Vs UOI & others Ex. PW­1/4 of Village Behlolpur Khadar, LAC No. 224/11 Jagdish Gulati Vs Union of India & others judgment dated 29.11.2011 read with review order dated 10.01.2012 of Village Jasola Ex. PW­1/5)} to claim higher compensation as determined in other cases, instead of what was LAC No. 49/2011 Page 7 of 14 Ram Saroop vs. UOI pleaded in the petition and then evidence was closed. PW­1 was cross examined by both the respondents.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Budh Singh Through Lrs & Ors. vs . Uoi & Ors. on 7 April, 2016

Evide nce ­ 4.2 In order to establish the issues the petitioners were given opportunity to lead evidence. Petitioner no. 1's LR Shri Ram Lal / PW1 entered into witness box for all the petitioners, he also tendered copies of judgment LAC No. 292/11 Hari Kishan/Hari Kishan (Ex. PW­1/4) of village Kilokari of same area and award, under section 18 of Land Acquisition Act besides judgments on surrounding areas {which were passed by Ld. Predecessor in case LAC No. 74/08 Lakhmi Chand & others Vs Union of India & another (Ex. PW­1/1); LAC No. 75/08 Smt. Sudesh Bhatia Vs UOI & others (Ex. PW­1/2) of Village Behlolpur Khadar, LAC No. 224/11 Jagdish Gulati Vs Union of India & others judgment dated 29.11.2011 read with review order dated 10.1.2012 of Village Jasola Ex. PW­1/3)} to claim higher compensation as determined in other cases, instead of what was pleaded in the petition and then evidence was closed. PW­1 has been cross examined by the respondent no. 1.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1