citedby: 95111828

Jinneng Clean Energy Technology Ltd vs Sunedison Energy Holding (Singapore) ... on 2 September, 2024

& Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI, (2019) 15 SCC 131 this Court cautioned that this ground would only be attracted with the following caveat : (SCC pp. 199-200, para

Madras High Court Cites 101 - Cited by 0 - C Saravanan - Full Document

Indus Towers Limited vs Sistema Shyam Teleserivices Limited on 20 December, 2023

Thus, from the decision in Ssangyong Engineering (Supra) itself, it is clear that this Court under Section 34 of the Act, 1996, cannot modify the majority Award by substituting it with the dissenting Award, and the decision in the afore cited judgment is clearly distinguishable from the facts of the present case.

Delhi High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - C D Singh - Full Document

Institute Of Human Behaviour And Allied ... vs Mi 2 C Securities And Facilities on 6 April, 2026

45. At this stage, it would be pertinent to note that we are dealing with a case where the application under Section 34 of the 1996 Act was filed after the 2015 Amendment, therefore the newly substituted/added Explanations would apply [Ssangyong Engg. & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI, (2019) 15 SCC 131].

Delhi High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mcd vs Anil Gupta And Ors on 6 April, 2026

45. At this stage, it would be pertinent to note that we are dealing with a case where the application under Section 34 of the 1996 Act was filed after the 2015 Amendment, therefore the newly substituted/added Explanations would apply [SsangyongEngg. & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI, (2019) 15 SCC 131].

Delhi High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jinneng Clean Energy Technology Ltd vs Sunedison Energy Holding (Singapore) ... on 2 September, 2024

& Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI, (2019) 15 SCC 131 this Court cautioned that this ground would only be attracted with the following caveat : (SCC pp. 199-200, para

Madras High Court Cites 101 - Cited by 0 - C Saravanan - Full Document

National Highway Authority Of India vs M S Ssangyong Engineering And ... on 8 April, 2024

83. Having said this, however, if a foreign award fails to determine a material issue which goes to the root of the matter or fails to decide a claim or counterclaim in its entirety, the award may shock the conscience of the Court and may not be enforced, as was done by the Delhi High Court in Campos [Campos Bros. Farms v. Matru Bhumi Supply Chain (P) Ltd., 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8350 : (2019) 261 DLT 201] on the ground of violation of the public policy of India, in that it would then offend a most basic notion of justice in this country [ In Ssangyong Engg. & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI, (2019) 15 SCC 131 : (2020) 2 SCC (Civ) 213 this Court cautioned that this ground would only be attracted with the following caveat : (SCC pp. 199-200, para

Delhi High Court Cites 67 - Cited by 0 - C D Singh - Full Document

Telecommunications Consultants India ... vs M/S Frans Global Infotech Ltd on 27 April, 2026

45. At this stage, it would be pertinent to note that we are dealing with a case where the application under Section 34 of the 1996 Act was filed after the 2015 Amendment, therefore the newly substituted/added Explanations would apply [Ssangyong Engg. & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI, (2019) 15 SCC 131].

Delhi High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Krishna Udyog vs Union Of India on 9 April, 2026

45. At this stage, it would be pertinent to note that we are dealing with a case where the application under Section 34 of the 1996 Act was filed after the 2015 Amendment, therefore the newly substituted/added Explanations would apply [Ssangyong Engg. & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI, (2019) 15 SCC 131].

Delhi High Court Cites 51 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Emr Chowdary vs Engineering Projects India Limited on 27 April, 2026

45. At this stage, it would be pertinent to note that we are dealing with a case where the application under Section 34 of the 1996 Act was filed after the 2015 Amendment, therefore the newly substituted/added Explanations would apply [Ssangyong Engg. & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI, (2019) 15 SCC 131].

Delhi High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Tdi International India Ltd vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation on 24 February, 2026

45. At this stage, it would be pertinent to note that we are dealing with a case where the application under Section 34 of the 1996 Act was filed after the 2015 Amendment, therefore the newly substituted/added Explanations would apply [SsangyongEngg. & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI, (2019) 15 SCC 131].

Delhi High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results