Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 80 (0.77 seconds)
Documents citing Ashok Kumar Jha & Anr vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 18 September, 2017

Neelmani Jaiswal vs Union Public Service Commission on 29 March, 2022

It is also submitted that this short-listing criteria clearly prescribes that number can be restricted by any or more of the following methods including, "on the basis of higher qualifications than the minimum prescribed in the advertisement". It is also submitted that all the successful candidates who are also private respondents possess requisite qualification and, in fact, possess higher educational qualifications. It is also pointed out that the applicant himself has qualification which is higher than the qualification prescribed and, therefore, on equal footing as other candidates. Private respondents have also relied upon the following judgments, including the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ashok Kumar and Another (supra):-
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ramesh Kumar & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 31 October, 2018

"35. Our attention has been drawn by learned Senior counsel, appearing for the Board, to the effect that the decision of this Court in case of Manoj Kumar (Supra), which has been relied upon by learned Single Judge, in his order under appeal, has been affirmed by a Division Bench decision of this Court reported in 2012 (1) PLJR 578 (Manoj Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.). Those cases had arisen out of preliminary test held by the Bihar Public Service Commission. In the said preliminary test, certain questions were found to have been incorrectly framed, which were decided Patna High Court CWJC No.17302 of 2018 dt. 31-10-2018 81/86 to be weeded out for the purpose of re-evaluation of the mark sheets. On going through the said decisions, we find that on many occasions, situations had arisen, where, in a multiple-choice question type test, framing of incorrect questions came to be detected after the examination had been held by statutory bodies, sometimes suo motu and sometimes after objections having been raised by the test takers, giving rise to several litigations. In order to remedy such a situation, the bodies, holding such tests, adopt different ways and means, of which the present case is a living example. Initially, when the Board had detected certain questions to be wrong, it had decided to delete such questions and re-evaluate the answer sheets on the basis of the remaining questions on pro rata basis. Subsequently, when more questions were detected to be incorrect by the expert body, they decided to give additional marks for each such incorrect question across the Board.
Patna High Court Cites 51 - Cited by 1 - S Pandey - Full Document

Nitesh Kumar Pandey vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 February, 2020

13. The learned senior Advocate for the appellants while contending that the writ petitioners having participated in the computer efficiency test are estopped from raising any grievance subsequently has placed strong reliance on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ashok Kumar and Another vs. State of Bihar and Others (2017) 4 SCC 357 wherein it is held as hereunder:­
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 61 - A S Bopanna - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next