Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.37 seconds)
Documents citing Kantilal Ravji Mehta And Anr. vs Sayarabai Chhaganlal Kering on 5 July, 2002

Krishna Ramchandra Jadhav @ Yadav, ... vs Smt. Shankari B. Ajimal on 26 July, 2005

17. Once the notice is valid and duly received and inspite of the demand made by the landlady, as the tenant failed to deposit the rent within the period as stipulated under the Bombay Rent Act, the order of eviction should follow. The following cases support of the respondent's submission - Ashok Kulkarni (supra) and Kantilal Mehta (supra) in which the Bombay High Court, after considering the provisions of Section 12(3) of the Bombay Rent Act in regard to non-payment of rent inspite of demand notice held that the Court has no option but to decree the suit for possession.
Bombay High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 4 - A V Mohta - Full Document
1