Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.26 seconds)

Nisar Ahmed Ramzan-Momin vs The Special Land Acquisition Officer ... on 14 February, 2018

14. The only question which now remains as to in which situation can the Appellant rely on the ready reckoner for the year 1994 for claiming the compensation. In this regard, we are inclined to accept the submissions of Mr.Datar in view of the two earlier Judgments referred by him passed by this Court in this behalf. Mr.Datar has invited out attention to the G.R. dated 31/10/1994 wherein it is clearly laid down that the valuation given in the ready reckoner was an important consideration and the valuation arrived at by different methods viz. sale instances, potentiality and the price mentioned in the ready reckoner should be taken into consideration and whichever was higher, should be granted as compensation. This Court has upheld the efficacy and application of this G.R. in such situation as mentioned in the Judgments of Shalini Godbole (supra) and The Municipal Corporation of City of Thane (supra). Thus, it was incumbent on the SLAO to have taken into consideration the ready reckoner for the year 1994 in deciding the rate of compensation. Such exercise was not done by the SLAO. The impugned Award passed by him shows that he has referred to the rate as per the ready reckoner but he has referred to the rate given in the URS 12 of 18 ::: Uploaded on - 16/02/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 17/02/2018 01:37:35 ::: 13 FA 846-12 Judgment.doc ready reckoner for the year 1992. He, on his own, had considered rise of 10% for the year 1994 and fixed the price at the rate of Rs.300/- per sq. meter in respect of the present Plot No.2. The SLAO has further mentioned that the lands under acquisition fell in Division No.1, Sub-Division No.2, Column No.4 of the said ready reckoner. As against this, the Appellant has produced a certified copy of the ready reckoner for the year 1994. The said ready reckoner was provided to him vide the letter dated 01/11/2011 by the office of the Sub- Registrar, Bhiwandi-1. The said copy is a certified copy and is produced on record at Exh.54.
Bombay High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 1 - S V Kotwal - Full Document
1