Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.01 seconds)

Chiranji Lal vs Bhiko on 6 February, 1969

(7) When the appeal came up for hearing before me Mr. Gopal Narain counsel for the respondent raised a preliminary objection to the maintainability of the appeal and urged the same grounds as had been raised in the Court below. He submitted that the impugned order could nto be treated as decree as defined in section 2(2) Civil Procedure Code and therefore no appeal could be filed against it. In this connection he referred me to Dharanidhar Ghose v. Janaki Mathi Mukerjee and others (4), The Madras and Southern Maharatta Railway by its General Manager v. Chengali Sydalli and another (5), Ramkeshwar Prasad and others v. Babu Girja Prasad (6), State of Travancore-Cochin v. Lekhmi Ammal Meenakshi Ammal and others (7).
Delhi High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1