The Karnataka State Cooperative ... vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(2)(1), ... on 9 April, 2026
24. The learned CIT(A) considered the materials available on record
and noted that the AO disallowed a sum of ₹1,15,39,744/- claimed as
provision for doubtful debts on the grounds that the same represents an
unascertained liability which is not allowable under the Act. The
contention of the assessee that the provision represents expected loan
defaults was not accepted. Reliance was placed on the judgment of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Southern Technologies Ltd. v. JCIT (320 ITR
.