Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 348 (4.83 seconds)
Documents citing Indian Tobacco Co. Ltd vs Industrial Court on 23 February, 1994

The Municipal Council Gondia And ... vs Gopal Nanaji Bhimate on 22 July, 2016

The judgment of learned Single Judge in case of Indian Tobacco Company Ltd. vs. The Industrial Court and Ors. (supra), judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court affirming it or then judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court reported at Western India Match ::: Uploaded on - 25/07/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 26/07/2016 23:59:30 ::: wp5191.04 48 Company Ltd. and Workmen are all considered therein & are distinguishable as the same do not pertain to the province of public employment or consider inherent Constitutional restraints (the suprema lex - see Mahendra L. Jain v. Indore Development Authority and others (supra) and Cl. 32 of the MSO. For same reasons, law laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2007 (1) CLR 460- 2007 (1) Mah.
Bombay High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

The Municipal Coulcil And Another vs Tulsidas Baliram Bindhade on 22 July, 2016

The judgment of learned Single Judge in case of Indian Tobacco Company Ltd. vs. The Industrial Court and Ors. (supra), judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court affirming it or then judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court reported at Western India Match ::: Uploaded on - 25/07/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 26/07/2016 23:59:15 ::: wp5191.04 48 Company Ltd. and Workmen are all considered therein & are distinguishable as the same do not pertain to the province of public employment or consider inherent Constitutional restraints (the suprema lex - see Mahendra L. Jain v. Indore Development Authority and others (supra) and Cl. 32 of the MSO. For same reasons, law laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2007 (1) CLR 460- 2007 (1) Mah.
Bombay High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 222 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

The Municipal Council And Another vs Balakdas Sandhu Barekar on 22 July, 2016

The judgment of learned Single Judge in case of Indian Tobacco Company Ltd. vs. The Industrial Court and Ors. (supra), judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court affirming it or then judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court reported at Western India Match ::: Uploaded on - 25/07/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 26/07/2016 23:59:25 ::: wp5191.04 48 Company Ltd. and Workmen are all considered therein & are distinguishable as the same do not pertain to the province of public employment or consider inherent Constitutional restraints (the suprema lex - see Mahendra L. Jain v. Indore Development Authority and others (supra) and Cl. 32 of the MSO. For same reasons, law laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2007 (1) CLR 460- 2007 (1) Mah.
Bombay High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

The Municipal Council And Another vs Ratan Tulsiram Nagdeve on 22 July, 2016

The judgment of learned Single Judge in case of Indian Tobacco Company Ltd. vs. The Industrial Court and Ors. (supra), judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court affirming it or then judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court reported at Western India Match ::: Uploaded on - 25/07/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 26/07/2016 23:59:19 ::: wp5191.04 48 Company Ltd. and Workmen are all considered therein & are distinguishable as the same do not pertain to the province of public employment or consider inherent Constitutional restraints (the suprema lex - see Mahendra L. Jain v. Indore Development Authority and others (supra) and Cl. 32 of the MSO. For same reasons, law laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2007 (1) CLR 460- 2007 (1) Mah.
Bombay High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

The Muncipal Council And Another vs Ashok Parasram Sansarede on 22 July, 2016

The judgment of learned Single Judge in case of Indian Tobacco Company Ltd. vs. The Industrial Court and Ors. (supra), judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court affirming it or then judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court reported at Western India Match ::: Uploaded on - 25/07/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 26/07/2016 23:59:27 ::: wp5191.04 48 Company Ltd. and Workmen are all considered therein & are distinguishable as the same do not pertain to the province of public employment or consider inherent Constitutional restraints (the suprema lex - see Mahendra L. Jain v. Indore Development Authority and others (supra) and Cl. 32 of the MSO. For same reasons, law laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2007 (1) CLR 460- 2007 (1) Mah.
Bombay High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

The Municipal Council And Another vs Kalu Mohammad Janmohammad Sheikh on 22 July, 2016

The judgment of learned Single Judge in case of Indian Tobacco Company Ltd. vs. The Industrial Court and Ors. (supra), judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court affirming it or then judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court reported at Western India Match ::: Uploaded on - 25/07/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 26/07/2016 23:59:21 ::: wp5191.04 48 Company Ltd. and Workmen are all considered therein & are distinguishable as the same do not pertain to the province of public employment or consider inherent Constitutional restraints (the suprema lex - see Mahendra L. Jain v. Indore Development Authority and others (supra) and Cl. 32 of the MSO. For same reasons, law laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2007 (1) CLR 460- 2007 (1) Mah.
Bombay High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

The Municicpal Council And Another vs Smt Vithabai Bhiwa Nagrikar on 22 July, 2016

The judgment of learned Single Judge in case of Indian Tobacco Company Ltd. vs. The Industrial Court and Ors. (supra), judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court affirming it or then judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court reported at Western India Match ::: Uploaded on - 25/07/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 30/07/2016 23:40:54 ::: wp5191.04 48 Company Ltd. and Workmen are all considered therein & are distinguishable as the same do not pertain to the province of public employment or consider inherent Constitutional restraints (the suprema lex - see Mahendra L. Jain v. Indore Development Authority and others (supra) and Cl. 32 of the MSO. For same reasons, law laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2007 (1) CLR 460- 2007 (1) Mah.
Bombay High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 1 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Ltd. (Denim Division)} vs // on 15 April, 2010

He has invited attention of this Court to the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported at 1973 (II) L.L.J. 403 (Western India Match Company Ltd. and Workmen) and a judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court reported at 1990 (1) CLR 88 (The Indian Tobacco Company Ltd. vs. The Industrial Court and Ors.). He states that the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Western India Match Company Ltd. (cited supra) considers the provisions of the Certified Standing Orders and that the judgment has been followed by learned Single Judge in the latter judgment (cited supra) as distinction between the Scheme of the Model Standing Orders and the Certified Standing Orders was not then pressed in service. According to him, the Model Standing Orders are applied to vast number and various types of Industries and hence, have been deliberately kept flexible. The Certified Standing Orders are framed after going through the procedure prescribed in Chapter VII of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 and hence, the individual needs are looked into by the third person who has to certify those Standing Orders. In this situation, the Certified Standing Orders are meant for individual application and hence, their violation needs to be viewed differently. Clause 29 of the Model Standing Orders is deliberately kept wide and as the application of Model Standing ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:50:58 ::: 10 Orders in present facts is not in dispute, Clause 29 is automatically attracted.
Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

The Municipal Council And Anaother vs Vithoba Rajaram Bhandarkar on 22 July, 2016

The judgment of learned Single Judge in case of Indian Tobacco Company Ltd. vs. The Industrial Court and Ors. (supra), judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court affirming it or then judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court reported at Western India Match ::: Uploaded on - 25/07/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 26/07/2016 23:59:17 ::: wp5191.04 48 Company Ltd. and Workmen are all considered therein & are distinguishable as the same do not pertain to the province of public employment or consider inherent Constitutional restraints (the suprema lex - see Mahendra L. Jain v. Indore Development Authority and others (supra) and Cl. 32 of the MSO. For same reasons, law laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2007 (1) CLR 460- 2007 (1) Mah.
Bombay High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

The Municipal Council And Another vs Vishwanath Pandurang Tumsare on 22 July, 2016

The judgment of learned Single Judge in case of Indian Tobacco Company Ltd. vs. The Industrial Court and Ors. (supra), judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court affirming it or then judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court reported at Western India Match ::: Uploaded on - 25/07/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 26/07/2016 23:59:23 ::: wp5191.04 48 Company Ltd. and Workmen are all considered therein & are distinguishable as the same do not pertain to the province of public employment or consider inherent Constitutional restraints (the suprema lex - see Mahendra L. Jain v. Indore Development Authority and others (supra) and Cl. 32 of the MSO. For same reasons, law laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2007 (1) CLR 460- 2007 (1) Mah.
Bombay High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next