Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.28 seconds)

Shri Kamal Sharma vs Of on 16 May, 2016

14. rt Now if coming to the findings recorded on issue No.1, while concurring with the same in the considered opinion of this Court the instances of cruelty as highlighted in the divorce petition not constitute the cruelty within the meaning of Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act and at the most amount to bear and tears of normal married life. Learned trial Judge has not committed any illegality and irregularity while holding that the degree of cruelty for seeking the decree of divorce should be over and above the mere bear and tears of routine married life. This Court in Kamaljit Bhullar Vs. Nimrat Preet Singh Bhullar, 1991 (1) Sim. L.C. 156 though has held that it is difficult to define the exact legal meaning of the expression "cruelty", however, as per the ratio of this judgment, it is conduct of such character so as to have caused danger to life, limb or health or as to give rise to a reasonable apprehension of such danger constitute ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 20:22:04 :::HCHP 10 cruelty in a matter of this nature. Similar is the ratio of the judgment .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - D C Chaudhary - Full Document
1