Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.35 seconds)

Khan Mohammad Kaif Masud And Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr Prin. Sec. ... on 8 April, 2026

12. Considering the continuous filing of Petitions by Petitioners who are similarly situated, we deem it appropriate to record that the managements would not appoint teachers who do not have the TET/CTET qualifications until the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.8300 of 2021 (Priti Ravindra Warghante and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.). The relief being granted vide this order, would be made applicable prospectively.
Bombay High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - R V Ghuge - Full Document

Nilesh Anil Muley vs Union Of India And Ors on 10 December, 2021

3. Mr. Rajpurohit, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 invited our attention to the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 5th July 2021 in Special Leave to Appeal No.8300 of 2021 filed by Priti and Others v/s The State of Maharashtra and Others and would submit that the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed an order of status-quo in the meanwhile, directing that the matter be heard on 6th August 2021 i.e. the returnable date.
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - R N Laddha - Full Document

Shankar Sayaram Pallewar vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 28 April, 2022

6. The learned Advocate for the petitioner states that the issue raised in the petition is pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide Special Leave Petition No. 8300 of 2021 ( Priti and others versus The State of Maharashtra and others ) and other connected matters, in which, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has granted order of status quo as prevailing on the date of said order. The said Special Leave Petition is still pending.
Bombay High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S G Mehare - Full Document
1