South Indian Bank Ltd vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Labour on 2 December, 2014
32. Syndicate Bank v. R.Muniraj and others reported in 1975 II LLJ 106.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.23 seconds)Documents citing
Syndicate Bank vs B. Muniraj And Ors. on 10 July, 1974
The Special Officer Tiruppur ... vs The Appellate Authority Under The Tamil ... on 26 April, 1990
In fact, the first respondent holds that from the date of the order of the Joint Registrar appeals had been filed in time and for this purpose he relies on a decision reported in Syndicate Bank v. Muniraj (1973) 2 L.L.J. 109. On the question whether the second respondent in each of the cases was guilty of laches because there was a delay of three months and nineteen days in filing appeals to the Joint Registrar, the first respondent says that the said period had been sufficiently explained in the memorandum of appeal. I am unable to find any error in the order of the first respondent. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, I am not inclined to interfere with the order of first respondent exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. So far as the second ground, that the order of the first respondent dated 10.3.1979 reviewing his earlier order is illegal, I have only to quote the averments in the affidavit which are as follows:
1