Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.26 seconds)
Documents citing M/S. Godrej Agrovet Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise on 8 October, 2013

M/S. Srd Nutrients Pvt. Ltd vs Commr. Of Central Excise & Service Tax, ... on 31 August, 2017

4. After hearing, all the parties have agreed that there are conflicting decisions of different Benches of the Tribunal and various High Courts. The matter has reached finally, to the Honble Supreme Court in the cases of Bharat Box Factory Ltd. Vs.Commissioner--2010 (249) ELT 828 (S.C.); SRD Nutrients Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commmissioner-2016 (338) ELT A284 (S.C.);and Godrej Agro Agrovet Ltd. Vs. Commissioner -2016 (338) ELT A27 (S.C.).
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 1 - Cited by 133 - Full Document

Crop Chemicals India Ltd vs Chandigarh-Ii on 28 June, 2024

3. Shri Shivam Syal Ld. Authorised Representative reiterates the findings of OIO and OIA and submits that the matter may be remanded to the original authority on the issue of classification, as the classification arrived at by the Commissioner (Appeals) was not as subject matter before the original authority; it may also be remanded for quantification of the refund amount. He relies on the Final Order No. FO/57954-57970/2013 dated 08.10.2013 passed by the Delhi Bench in the case of M/s Godrej Agrovet Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jammu.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Pan Parag India Limited vs Cce, Dibrugarh on 31 August, 2017

4. After hearing, both sides have agreed that there are conflicting decisions of different Benches of the Tribunal and various High Courts. They submitted that the matter has reached finally to the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Box Factory Ltd. Vs Commissioner, 2010 (249) ELT 828 (S.C.); SRD Nutrients Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, 2016 (338) ELT A284 (S.C.); and Godrej Agro Agrovet Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, 2016 (338) ELT A27 (S.C.), which is still pending and, therefore, decision cannot be taken without the final verdict of the Honble Supreme Court.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1